Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Additional techniques for producing multiple-schedule control in children
Insights
This study evaluated multiple schedule procedures for stimulus control in children. Multiple fixed-ratio-extinction, differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior, and differential-reinforcement-for-low-rate schedules effectively produced stimulus control.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Child Development
Background:
- Reliable stimulus control is crucial for behavioral interventions.
- Multiple schedule procedures are complex and require careful evaluation for efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of various multiple schedule procedures in establishing reliable stimulus control in children aged 4-7 years.
- To investigate supplementary techniques for enhancing stimulus control with specific schedules.
Main Methods:
- Experiments involved 132 children (ages 4-7) exposed to multiple fixed-ratio-extinction (mult FR EXT), multiple differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior-fixed-ratio (mult DRO FR), multiple differential-reinforcement-for-low-rate-fixed-ratio (mult DRL FR), and multiple fixed-interval-fixed-ratio (mult FI FR) schedules.
- Investigated techniques included blocking FRs, increasing FR size, adding DRL to FI, schedule shifting, and incorporating an external clock.
Main Results:
- Mult FR EXT, mult DRO FR, and mult DRL FR schedules demonstrated strong stimulus control.
- Mult DRO FR was particularly effective for uncooperative children or those with high initial response rates.
- Mult FI FR schedules required additional procedures for most subjects, with blocking FRs, increasing FR size, DRL integration, and schedule shifting proving beneficial.
- Adding an external clock to mult FI FR schedules, especially after a transition from mult FR EXT, significantly enhanced stimulus control, even for previously uncontrolled subjects.
Conclusions:
- Multiple schedule procedures, particularly mult FR EXT, mult DRO FR, and mult DRL FR, are effective in establishing stimulus control in young children.
- Modifications such as blocking, increasing response requirements, and incorporating DRL components can improve control with mult FI FR schedules.
- The addition of an external clock to mult FI FR schedules offers a potent method for developing robust stimulus control, particularly in challenging cases.
Abstract:
The subjects in these experiments were 132 children, varying in age from 4 to 7 years. These experiments were designed to assess the efficacy of various multiple scheduling procedures in producing reliable stimulus control. The schedules studied were multiple fixed-ratio-extinction (mult FR EXT); multiple differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior-fixed-ratio (mult DRO FR); multiple differential-reinforcement-for-low-rate-fixed-ratio (mult DRL FR); and multiple fixed-interval-fixed-ratio (mult FI FR). In addition other techniques were investigated, such as presenting FR's in blocks; increasing the size of the FR's; attaching a DRL to the FI members; temporarily shifting to new schedules; and adding an external clock to the FI's. These experiments yielded the following results.1.) Strong stimulus control was produced by mult FR EXT, mult DRO FR, and mult DRL FR schedules. Control for mult FR EXT was mediated principally by the individual stimuli, though on occasion it was dependent in part on the change of stimuli. The mult DRO FR was found to be highly useful for those children who had very high initial rates or who were generally uncooperative and unmanageable.2.) Contrary to a previous finding, some subjects were brought under stimulus control by means of mult FI FR schedules without the aid of additional procedures. Most, however, were not. Additional techniques found to augment the development of mult FI FR control included: (1) presenting FR's in blocks; (2) increasing the size of the FR's; (3) attaching a DRL to the FI component for a time and later removing it; and (4) shifting to a mult DRL FR, developing control, and then returning to the original mult FI FR.3.) Addition of an external clock to the FI components of the mult FI FR had several effects. Strongest control, including well-developed acceleratory patterns during the FI's, was developed in those subjects who had first been shifted from a regular mult FI FR to a mult FR EXT, brought under control, and then returned to the mult FI FR with the clock added. The added clock also produced strong control if it was present when the subject was first begun on a mult FI FR schedule. In some cases, the addition of the clock produced control in subjects who had not been controlled previously by the regular mult FI FR, but these were always subjects who had high rates. The addition of the clock first lowered the rate, then produced control.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
07:20Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...