Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rates and patterns of responding with concurrent fixed-interval and variable-interval reinforcement.

J A Nevin

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
    |September 1, 1971
    PubMed
    Summary

    Pigeons

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Timing and choice in concurrent chains.

    Behavioural processes·2014
    Same author

    Keller, Schoenfeld, Cumming, and Berryman as instructional stimuli.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Beyond pride and humility.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    The threat of nuclear war: Some responses.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2001
    Same author

    Behavioral momentum and the law of effect.

    The Behavioral and brain sciences·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Behavioral psychology and animal cognition.

    Background:

    • Investigating how different reinforcement schedules influence animal behavior is crucial for understanding learning principles.
    • Concurrent schedules of reinforcement present complex choice scenarios for subjects.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine pigeon behavior under concurrent fixed-interval (FI) and variable-interval (VI) schedules of food reinforcement.
    • To determine how the relative frequency of reinforcement affects response allocation between schedules.

    Main Methods:

    • Pigeons were trained on two keys, each associated with a concurrent FI and VI schedule.
    • Systematic variation of reinforcement timing allowed for analysis of response patterns.

    Main Results:

    • The relative frequency of responding on the FI key was influenced by, but did not equal, the relative reinforcement frequency.
    • Response ratios followed a power function of reinforcement ratios (exponent 0.5).
    • FI response patterns were sensitive to both relative and absolute schedule values.

    Conclusions:

    • Pigeon's choice behavior under concurrent schedules is quantitatively predictable by a power function of reinforcement ratios.
    • Reinforcement schedule values (both relative and absolute) impact response patterns and allocation in complex ways.

    Related Experiment Videos