Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Maintaining responding during stimulus generalization testing in extinction.

K Malott, R W Malott, M F Glenn

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
    |March 1, 1973
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    An analysis of concept learning: simple conceptual control and definition-based conceptual control.

    The Analysis of verbal behavior·2012
    Same author

    "I'll do it when the snow melts": The effects of deadlines and delayed outcomes on rule-governed behavior in preschool children.

    The Analysis of verbal behavior·2012
    Same author

    Rule-governed behavior and behavioral anthropology.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Introduction: how the happy few might become the competent many.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Saving the world by teaching behavior analysis: a behavioral systems approach.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Comments on the learn unit.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same journal

    The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Shaping the extinction burst: Increasing its probability and preventing its emergence across topographies.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating the combined effects of effort and probability on monetary discounting.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    An improved translational approach to studying persistence-strengthening effects of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Interactions between the effects of food and water motivating operations on concurrent food- and water-reinforced responding in mice.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Odor-visual and visual-visual matching to sample with dogs.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    See all related articles

    The long-adjusting-interval schedule enhances resistance to extinction and gradient stability in behavioral studies. This method offers advantages over conventional schedules for understanding learning and memory.

    Area of Science:

    • Behavioral psychology
    • Learning and memory
    • Operant conditioning

    Background:

    • Understanding how different reinforcement schedules impact learning and behavior is crucial in psychology.
    • Previous research has explored various interval schedules, but the long-adjusting-interval schedule's effects require further elucidation.
    • Generalization gradients and resistance to extinction are key metrics for assessing learning persistence and stimulus control.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the effects of a long-adjusting-interval schedule on resistance to extinction.
    • To compare generalization gradients produced by a long-adjusting-interval schedule versus a conventional short-random-interval schedule.
    • To assess the stability of gradient slopes under the long-adjusting-interval schedule.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Subjects were trained using a long-adjusting-interval schedule where a large reinforcer concluded each session.
    • Session lengths varied, but typically concluded at 42.66 minutes.
    • Generalization tests were conducted, comparing subjects trained with the long-adjusting-interval schedule to those trained with a short-random-interval schedule.

    Main Results:

    • The long-adjusting-interval schedule did not qualitatively alter generalization gradients compared to the conventional schedule.
    • Subjects trained with the long-adjusting-interval schedule exhibited significantly greater resistance to extinction.
    • More stable gradient slopes were observed within and across generalization tests for the long-adjusting-interval schedule group.

    Conclusions:

    • The long-adjusting-interval schedule offers distinct advantages in promoting behavioral persistence.
    • This schedule enhances resistance to extinction and gradient stability without altering the fundamental nature of generalization gradients.
    • The findings suggest the long-adjusting-interval schedule is a valuable tool for studying learning and behavioral resilience.