Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear
11:17

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear

Published on: August 24, 2012

The relative aversiveness of signalled versus unsignalled shock-punishment

L Macdonald

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
    |July 1, 1973
    PubMed

    More Related Videos

    Trace Fear Conditioning in Mice07:02

    Trace Fear Conditioning in Mice

    Published on: March 20, 2014

    Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice04:14

    Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice

    Published on: November 22, 2024

    Related Concept Videos

    Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

    Milgram's Obedience to Authority

    Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
    Punishment01:27

    Punishment

    Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
    Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
    Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

    Sign Test for Matched Pairs

    The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
    To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
    Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

    Timing and Consequences on Behavior

    In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
    Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
    Law of Effect01:06

    Law of Effect

    B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
    Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
    Statistical Significance01:37

    Statistical Significance

    Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...