Fixed-ratio and fixed-interval schedule control of matching-to-sample errors by children
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Insights
Children
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Child Development
Background:
- Operant conditioning principles are well-established in animal behavior.
- Understanding schedule control in children is crucial for educational and therapeutic applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how different reinforcement schedules influence matching-to-sample performance in children.
- To compare children's responses to reinforcement schedules with those of nonhuman animals.
Main Methods:
- Nine children (ages 4-7) completed matching-to-sample tasks under fixed-ratio, fixed-interval, variable-ratio, and variable-interval schedules.
- Three delay conditions were used: simultaneous, zero-delay, and 2-second delay.
- Error patterns and accuracy were analyzed across conditions.
Main Results:
- Fixed-ratio schedules produced systematic error distributions in most children, with errors concentrated after reinforcement.
- Fixed-interval schedules also produced error distributions, peaking in the second quarter of the interval.
- Variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules resulted in lower accuracy and no systematic error patterns.
Conclusions:
- Schedule control of complex operants in children parallels findings in nonhuman animals.
- Reinforcement schedule type significantly impacts error patterns in children's learning.
- Children exhibit predictable error distributions under specific reinforcement schedules, similar to animal models.
Abstract:
Nine children, ages 4 through 7 yr, matched-to-sample on fixed-ratio, fixed-interval, variable-ratio, and variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Simultaneous, zero-delay, and 2-sec delay matching were employed. Distributions of errors, in which the greatest number of errors occurred at the ordinal position immediately after reinforcement with fewer errors occurring at subsequent positions in the ratio, were produced by six of six children on fixed-ratio schedules for zero-delay and both of two children for 2-sec delay matching. Only two children of seven produced similar error distributions on simultaneous matching for fixed-ratio reinforcement. Variable-ratio schedules produced slightly lower accuracy for most subjects and no systematic error patterns for any subject. Error distributions occurred for all of the five children who experienced fixed-interval schedules for zero-delay matching. Peak error production occurred in the second fourth of the interval. Similar patterns were not produced on variable-interval schedules of equal reinforcement density. Schedule control of complex discriminated operants in children resembles control over similar responses of nonhuman animals.
Related Concept Videos
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors
Fixed Action Patterns

