Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

09:43
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
Published on: August 10, 2014
Effects of instructional constraints on human fixed-interval performance
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|March 1, 1981
Summary
Human fixed-interval (FI) schedules show varied performance patterns. Minimizing session duration reduced pausing and increased reinforcement density, highlighting sensitivity to experimental conditions.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral psychology
- Human operant conditioning
Background:
- Fixed-interval (FI) schedules are fundamental in operant conditioning research.
- Human performance under FI schedules can be influenced by various factors beyond basic reinforcement principles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate human behavior under a fixed-interval 27-second schedule.
- To examine the effects of response constraints and session duration on human FI performance.
- To explore the impact of response placement contingencies within the interreinforcement interval (IRI).
Main Methods:
- Human subjects were exposed to a fixed-interval 27-second schedule.
- Experimental conditions included instructions to limit responses per reinforcer and/or session duration.
- One group received additional contingencies for response placement within the IRI.
Main Results:
- Observed performance patterns were diverse, some resembling those in animal subjects under FI schedules.
- Instructions to minimize session duration decreased post-reinforcement pausing.
- Minimizing session duration increased overall reinforcement density compared to response-limiting instructions alone.
Conclusions:
- Human fixed-interval performance is highly sensitive to experimental manipulations.
- Extra-experimental contingencies, such as instructions, significantly shape behavior under FI schedules.
- Findings underscore the complexity of human operant behavior and its responsiveness to contextual factors.
Related Concept Videos
Reinforcement Schedules
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
Once a behavior is learned,...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

