Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preference in concurrent variable-interval fixed-ratio schedules.

M Davison

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
    |January 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A Validation Study of the Paediatric Non-Urgent Risk Assessment Management and Nurse Escort Assessment (PaNURAMA) Tool for Paediatric Inter-Hospital Transfers.

    Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA·2025
    Same author

    Of fruits and fats: high-sugar diets restore fatty acid profiles in the white adipose tissue of captive dwarf lemurs.

    Proceedings. Biological sciences·2022
    Same author

    Choosing a future from a murky past: A generalization-based model of behavior.

    Behavioural processes·2022
    Same author

    SU-E-T-461: Fractionation Schedule Optimization for Lung Cancer Treatments Using Radiobiological and Dose Distribution Characteristics.

    Medical physics·2017
    Same author

    Healthcare use among preschool children attending GP-led urgent care centres: a descriptive, observational study.

    BMJ open·2016
    Same author

    Tea trolleys and infection control.

    Anaesthesia·2015
    Same journal

    The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Shaping the extinction burst: Increasing its probability and preventing its emergence across topographies.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating the combined effects of effort and probability on monetary discounting.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    An improved translational approach to studying persistence-strengthening effects of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Interactions between the effects of food and water motivating operations on concurrent food- and water-reinforced responding in mice.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Odor-visual and visual-visual matching to sample with dogs.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    See all related articles

    Pigeon behavior on concurrent schedules showed bias toward variable-interval schedules, but a new dual-sensitivity model better explains these reinforcement learning patterns.

    Area of Science:

    • Behavioral science
    • Animal behavior
    • Operant conditioning

    Background:

    • The generalized matching law is a model describing how organisms allocate responses between concurrent schedules of reinforcement.
    • Previous studies have shown biases in response allocation that are not fully explained by this law.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate pigeon behavior under concurrent variable-interval and fixed-ratio schedules.
    • To test the explanatory power of the generalized matching law and propose an extension.

    Main Methods:

    • Five pigeons were trained on concurrent variable-interval and fixed-ratio schedules across three experiments.
    • Reinforcement rates and schedule parameters were systematically varied.
    • Data were analyzed using the generalized matching law and a proposed dual-sensitivity model.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • In Experiment 1, sensitivity to reinforcement was near 1.0, with a bias toward the variable-interval schedule.
    • In Experiment 2, sensitivities were lower, and performance biased toward the fixed-ratio schedule.
    • The generalized matching law failed to account for discrepancies between Experiments 1 and 2.

    Conclusions:

    • The generalized matching law requires modification to fully explain behavior under concurrent schedules.
    • A proposed dual-sensitivity model successfully accounted for the observed data and clarified previous findings.
    • This research advances our understanding of reinforcement learning and response allocation.