Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

09:43
A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
Published on: April 15, 2014
Temporal control in a complex environment: An analysis of schedule-related behavior
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|May 1, 1983
Summary
Collateral activities in rats, when prevented, increased lever pressing under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules. These behaviors may facilitate operant responding by removing subjects from reinforcement-related stimuli.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral neuroscience
- Animal behavior
Background:
- Collateral activities are behaviors occurring alongside primary operant responses.
- Their function in operant conditioning, particularly under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) schedules, remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of collateral activities in rats' lever pressing under DRL schedules.
- To test hypotheses that collateral activities serve timekeeping, discriminative, or inhibitory functions.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments utilized an automated ten-compartment chamber to record collateral activities in rats.
- Rats were reinforced for lever pressing on DRL schedules, with varying manipulations of stimulus support for collateral activities.
Main Results:
- Removing stimulus support for collateral activities increased lever pressing rates.
- Lever pressing rates increased only when stimulus support was fully removed and rats remained near the operant chamber.
- Collateral activities did not show predictive temporal or sequential patterns for operant responding.
Conclusions:
- Collateral activities do not appear to have a timekeeping, discriminative, or direct inhibitory function on operant responding.
- Results suggest collateral activities may facilitate operant responding indirectly by removing the subject from reinforcement-related stimuli.
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Reinforcement Schedules
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
Once a behavior is learned,...
Naturalistic Observations
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
