Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Matching, maximizing, and hill-climbing.

J M Hinson, J E Staddon

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
    |November 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Animals consistently choose better options in simple scenarios. Momentary maximizing explains both simple choices and complex matching behavior, unifying behavioral economics principles.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation.

    Accident; analysis and prevention·2018
    Same author

    Total sleep deprivation does not significantly degrade semantic encoding.

    Chronobiology international·2018
    Same author

    Editorial.

    Behavioural processes·2014
    Same author

    Preferences for constant duration delays and constant sized rewards in human subjects.

    Behavioural processes·2014
    Same author

    Probabilistic choice: A simple invariance.

    Behavioural processes·2014
    Same author

    Response selection in operant learning.

    Behavioural processes·2014
    Same journal

    The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Shaping the extinction burst: Increasing its probability and preventing its emergence across topographies.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating the combined effects of effort and probability on monetary discounting.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    An improved translational approach to studying persistence-strengthening effects of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Interactions between the effects of food and water motivating operations on concurrent food- and water-reinforced responding in mice.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Odor-visual and visual-visual matching to sample with dogs.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Behavioral Economics
    • Animal Cognition
    • Reinforcement Learning

    Background:

    • Animals often exhibit consistent preference for better alternatives in simple choices.
    • The matching law accurately predicts choice and reinforcement ratios under complex schedules but fails to explain simple preferences.
    • Existing models do not fully account for both simple and complex choice behaviors observed in animals.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the unifying principles underlying animal choice behavior across different scenarios.
    • To evaluate the efficacy of 'hill-climbing' rules, specifically momentary maximizing, in explaining both simple and complex choice patterns.
    • To demonstrate how momentary maximizing constrains overall choice to approximate matching law predictions.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Analysis of animal choices under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval and variable-interval variable-ratio schedules.
    • Modeling animal behavior using hill-climbing algorithms, focusing on momentary maximizing.
    • Empirical testing with pigeons to observe the covariation between molar choice and momentary maximizing estimates.

    Main Results:

    • Momentary maximizing successfully accounts for consistent choices in simple situations.
    • Molar choice behavior in pigeons was shown to covary with their momentary maximizing estimates.
    • The study demonstrates that the generalized matching law can be derived from various hill-climbing rules.

    Conclusions:

    • Momentary maximizing provides a unified framework for understanding animal choice, encompassing both simple preferences and complex matching behavior.
    • This finding reconciles discrepancies between simple choice observations and predictions of the matching law.
    • Hill-climbing principles offer a robust explanation for the generalized matching law in behavioral economics.