Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimal temporal differentiation.

M D Zeiler, G K Scott, M S Hoyert

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
    |March 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Adult humans adjusted button press timing to meet duration requirements. Optimality theory accurately predicted performance, especially when upper bounds were imposed, suggesting time minimization guides human interval timing.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    On sundials, springs, and atoms.

    Behavioural processes·2014
    Same author

    Expression of microRNA-146 suppresses NF-kappaB activity with reduction of metastatic potential in breast cancer cells.

    Oncogene·2008
    Same author

    Ets regulation of the erbB2 promoter.

    Oncogene·2001
    Same author

    Targeting of PKA to glutamate receptors through a MAGUK-AKAP complex.

    Neuron·2000
    Same author

    Targeting the ets binding site of the HER2/neu promoter with pyrrole-imidazole polyamides.

    The Journal of biological chemistry·2000
    Same author

    Alternative splicing regulates the subcellular localization of A-kinase anchoring protein 18 isoforms.

    The Journal of cell biology·1999
    Same journal

    The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Shaping the extinction burst: Increasing its probability and preventing its emergence across topographies.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating the combined effects of effort and probability on monetary discounting.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    An improved translational approach to studying persistence-strengthening effects of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Interactions between the effects of food and water motivating operations on concurrent food- and water-reinforced responding in mice.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    Same journal

    Odor-visual and visual-visual matching to sample with dogs.

    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Human Factors Engineering
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Human interval timing is crucial for many tasks.
    • Previous models like scalar timing theory have limitations.
    • Understanding timing mechanisms informs human-computer interaction and performance optimization.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate human interval timing under different temporal constraints.
    • To test the predictive power of optimality theory against empirical data.
    • To compare optimality theory with scalar timing processes and Weber's law.

    Main Methods:

    • Adult participants performed a button-pressing task with varying temporal requirements (minimum duration, or duration between lower and upper bounds).
    • Interresponse times and their variability were analyzed.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Data were compared against predictions from optimality theory and scalar timing models.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean interresponse times exceeded lower bounds and decreased with stricter upper bounds.
    • Variability increased with lower bounds but was unaffected by upper bounds.
    • Optimality theory closely predicted performance, particularly with upper bounds, outperforming scalar timing models.

    Conclusions:

    • Human interval timing appears to be guided by a strategy of minimizing response time, as predicted by optimality theory.
    • Optimality theory offers a more comprehensive explanation of timing behavior than scalar timing processes or Weber's law.
    • Feedback on errors reduced response time variability but not the mean.