Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026
07:55
The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System
Published on: April 14, 2021
Reply to silberberg and ziriax
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|September 1, 1987
Summary
This study challenges the theory of molecular maximization, finding it too ambiguous for independent testing. The authors argue that Silberberg and Ziriax's data do not exclusively support molecular maximization over melioration.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Animal Behavior
- Learning Theory
Background:
- Vaughan's (1981) work proposed melioration as an explanation for behavioral allocation.
- Silberberg and Ziriax (1985) introduced molecular maximization as an alternative theory.
- A modified procedure was used to test these competing theories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the empirical support for molecular maximization.
- To critically assess the ambiguity of the molecular maximization theory.
- To determine if Silberberg and Ziriax's data definitively refute melioration.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from a modified procedure based on Vaughan's (1981) work.
- Comparison of results against predictions of melioration and molecular maximization.
- Examination of the theoretical clarity and testability of molecular maximization.
Main Results:
- Results were inconsistent with melioration.
- Results were reported as consistent with molecular maximization.
- The theory of molecular maximization was found to be insufficiently unambiguous for independent testing.
Conclusions:
- The data presented by Silberberg and Ziriax (1985) are not exclusively consistent with molecular maximization.
- The ambiguity of molecular maximization prevents clear differentiation from melioration.
- Further refinement or clarification of molecular maximization is needed for empirical validation.
Related Concept Videos
02:16Surveys
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
01:14SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
01:20Diazonium Group Substitution with Halogens and Cyanide: Sandmeyer and Schiemann Reactions
Arenediazonium substitution reactions occur when the diazonium group is substituted by various functional groups such as halides, hydroxyl, nitrile, etc. For instance, arenediazonium salts react with copper(I) salts of chloride, bromide, or cyanide to form corresponding aryl chlorides, bromides, and nitriles. These reactions are named Sandmeyer reactions. Although the mechanism of this reaction is complicated, as illustrated in Figure 1, they are believed to progress via an aryl copper...
01:37Social Loafing
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
02:12Relationship Formation
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
04:49Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...