Related Experiment Videos
Behavioral economics and behavioral momentum.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|November 1, 1995
Summary
Behavioral momentum and economic principles offer new ways to understand reinforcement. Reanalyzing data reveals shared concepts, but fundamental differences remain in explaining behavior selection versus utility maximization.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral psychology
- Behavioral economics
- Operant conditioning
Background:
- Elasticity of demand and resistance to change are key concepts in behavioral economics and psychology, respectively.
- Behavioral momentum offers a metaphor for understanding response persistence.
- Previous research has explored reinforcement schedules and their impact on behavior.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reanalyze the relationship between elasticity of demand and reinforcement conditions using the behavioral momentum framework.
- To reanalyze the relationship between resistance to change and reinforcement conditions using behavioral economics.
- To compare labor supply data under variable-ratio schedules with existing data on interval schedules.
Main Methods:
- Reanalysis of existing data on elasticity of demand and resistance to change.
- Application of the behavioral momentum approach to understand reinforcement.
- Comparison of steady-state resistance data with labor supply data.
Main Results:
- Two functions based on the behavioral momentum approach were identified, relating behavioral mass to reinforcement.
- A relationship between relative unit price and relative behavioral mass suggests convergent measurement possibilities.
- The study highlights fundamental differences between the momentum and economic approaches regarding behavior selection versus utility maximization.
Conclusions:
- Behavioral momentum and economic approaches provide complementary, yet distinct, perspectives on reinforcement.
- Convergent measurement of a common theoretical construct may be possible.
- The core difference lies in whether behavior is viewed as selected by consequences or as a utility-maximizing bundle.