Related Experiment Videos
Residence time and choice in concurrent foraging schedules.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|March 1, 1996
Summary
Pigeons trained on a concurrent-schedule procedure showed that both response and time allocation increased with decreasing reinforcer arrival rates (lambda) and increasing probabilities of reinforcement (rho). Allocation ratios consistently undermatched reinforcer availability ratios.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Animal Behavior
- Operant Conditioning
Background:
- Concurrent-schedule procedures model choice behavior.
- The "some patches are empty" procedure investigates foraging decisions.
- Understanding patch residence time is crucial for choice behavior research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate pigeon's time and response allocation in a concurrent-schedule procedure.
- To examine how reinforcer probability and arrival rate influence foraging decisions.
- To compare observed allocation with optimal foraging strategies.
Main Methods:
- Five pigeons were trained on a concurrent-schedule task with two alternatives signaled by keylights.
- A switching key allowed travel between alternatives.
- Reinforcer availability was manipulated by varying probabilities (rho) and arrival rates (lambda).
Main Results:
- Both response and time allocation increased as reinforcer arrival rates (lambda) decreased and probabilities (rho) increased.
- Pigeons' residence times were longer than predicted by optimal foraging models.
- Allocation ratios consistently undermatched reinforcer arrival time and frequency ratios.
Conclusions:
- Pigeon's allocation behavior is sensitive to reinforcer probability and arrival rates.
- Observed undermatching suggests deviations from strict optimal foraging in this paradigm.
- Findings contribute to understanding decision-making under variable reinforcement schedules.