Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

A Protocol for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Rats using Linear Staplers
Published on: August 21, 2021
Rationale, design, and methods for glycemic control in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2
Michelle F Magee1, William L Isley,
1MedStar Diabetes Institute, MedStar Research Institute at Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, USA. michelle.f.magee@medstar.net
Abstract:
A major therapeutic question in considering accelerated atherogenesis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is whether reducing insulin resistance, as a proximal defect of a host of proatherogenic abnormalities including hyperglycemia, will be superior for decreasing mortality and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk compared with treating hyperglycemia to overcome insulin resistance with insulin-providing agents. This question is highly relevant, since earlier targeted glycemic control trials utilizing conventional glucose-lowering strategies that increase insulin levels have generally failed to reduce CAD risk despite markedly reducing microvascular risk. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial seeks to determine whether primarily using an insulin-sensitizing strategy for treatment of type 2 diabetes is superior when compared with primarily using an insulin-providing strategy with regard to cardiovascular outcomes. This article presents the rationale, design, and methods being used to test the glycemic control hypothesis in BARI 2D.
Insights
Reducing insulin resistance may be more effective than insulin-boosting drugs for improving cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients. The BARI 2D trial compares these strategies to reduce mortality and coronary artery disease risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Diseases
Background:
- Accelerated atherosclerosis is a major concern in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance are key proatherogenic factors.
- Previous trials using insulin-increasing agents showed limited cardiovascular benefits despite microvascular improvements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of an insulin-sensitizing strategy versus an insulin-providing strategy in type 2 diabetes patients.
- To determine which strategy is superior for reducing mortality and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk.
- To test the glycemic control hypothesis within the BARI 2D trial.
Main Methods:
- The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial is a randomized controlled trial.
- Patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease are assigned to either an insulin-sensitizing or insulin-providing glycemic control strategy.
- Cardiovascular outcomes, mortality, and CAD risk are primary endpoints.
Main Results:
- This article presents the rationale, design, and methods of the BARI 2D trial.
- Specific results regarding cardiovascular outcomes are not detailed in this abstract.
- The study aims to provide critical data on optimal glycemic management for cardiovascular health in diabetes.
Conclusions:
- The BARI 2D trial will elucidate whether targeting insulin resistance directly is superior to increasing insulin levels for managing cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes.
- Findings will inform therapeutic decisions for patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.
- This research addresses a significant gap in understanding diabetes management and cardiovascular outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
