Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introspection01:29

Introspection

156
Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...
156
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

259
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
259
Humanistic Psychology01:24

Humanistic Psychology

2.3K
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
2.3K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.5K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

254.9K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
254.9K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

64.0K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
64.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Free will in the eyes of Muslims and Christians.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Decision-making preferences for intuition, deliberation, friends or crowds in independent and interdependent societies.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Is evidence of language-like properties evidence of a language-of-thought architecture?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

Investigating the concept of representation in the neural and psychological sciences.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Is Identity Essentialism a Fundamental Feature of Human Cognition?

Cognitive science·2023
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Concept empiricism: a methodological critique.

Edouard Machery1

  • 1Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, 1017 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. machery@pitt.edu

Cognition
|July 4, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Neo-empiricism in cognitive science faces challenges in proving its concepts against amodal theories. This study identifies key difficulties in experimental design and generalization for embodied cognition research.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Philosophy of Mind
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Neo-empiricism, emphasizing embodied cognition, is increasingly influential in psychology and philosophy.
  • Existing research often struggles to definitively differentiate neo-empiricist predictions from amodal approaches to concepts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the empirical challenges faced by neo-empiricist theories of concepts and cognition.
  • To highlight the difficulties in designing experiments that can unequivocally support embodied cognition over amodal theories.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of existing empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks.
  • Identification of methodological limitations in experimental tasks used to study concepts.
  • Examination of the generalizability of findings across different cognitive processes and contexts.

Main Results:

  • Difficulty in distinguishing predictions between amodal and neo-empiricist models of cognition.
  • Experimental tasks often rely on imagery, which can confound results.
  • Generalizing findings from specific contexts to broader cognitive processes remains problematic.

Conclusions:

  • Neo-empiricists must address significant methodological hurdles to provide conclusive evidence against amodal theories.
  • Future research needs carefully designed tasks and consideration of context-dependency to advance the embodied cognition debate.