Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Issues on research integrity: a perspective.

Chris B Pascal1

  • 1Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Suite 750, Tower Building, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. cpascal@osophs.dhhs.gov

Experimental Biology and Medicine (Maywood, N.J.)
|July 4, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nobel round-table discussion #2: conflicts of interest, scientific misconduct, fair sharing, and intellectual property in an interdisciplinary/inter-institutional consortium.

Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)·2006
Same author

Complainant issues in research misconduct: the office of research integrity experience.

Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)·2006
Same author

Managing data for integrity: policies and procedures for ensuring the accuracy and quality of the data in the laboratory.

Science and engineering ethics·2006
Same author

The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.

Science and engineering ethics·2001
Same journal

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase 4 in lung disease: a review of its biology and therapeutic potential.

Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Phenotypic profiling of Pathogen Box compounds MMV667494 and MMV028694 in bloodstream-form <i>Trypanosoma brucei brucei</i>.

Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

High systolic blood pressure and stroke: evidence from the NHANES 1999-2023 and global burden of disease 2021.

Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Scaling human liver microphysiological systems: implementing a higher-throughput liver acinus microphysiological system platform.

Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Race, oxygen exposure, and retinopathy of prematurity: re-examining a persistent epidemiologic paradox.

Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Peripheral immune cells and glycation indices as potential diagnostic biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)·2026
See all related articles

Ensuring integrity in biomedical research is crucial for reliable outcomes. This paper addresses data quality, mentorship, and misconduct to maintain public trust in science.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Research
  • Scientific Integrity
  • Research Ethics

Background:

  • The biomedical research enterprise faces challenges impacting its integrity and success.
  • Maintaining public confidence requires addressing issues of misconduct and transparency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss key issues vital for the integrity and success of biomedical research.
  • To highlight how addressing these issues can improve research outcomes and minimize negative consequences.

Main Methods:

  • Review of normative practices in research.
  • Emphasis on the importance of data quality.
  • Discussion of mentorship for young scientists.
  • Exploration of procedures for handling misconduct.
  • Analysis of the impact of misconduct and lack of transparency on public trust.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identifying critical factors for a robust research enterprise.
  • Understanding the consequences of poor data quality and lack of transparency.
  • Recognizing the role of effective mentorship in scientific development.

Conclusions:

  • Proactive attention to research integrity, data quality, and mentorship is essential.
  • Clear protocols for addressing misconduct are necessary to uphold scientific standards.
  • Transparency and ethical conduct are paramount for sustaining public confidence in biomedical research.