Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Image analysis methods for diffuse optical tomography.

Brian W Pogue1, Scott C Davis, Xiaomei Song

  • 1Dartmouth College, Thayer School of Engineering, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA. pogue@Darthmouth.EDU

Journal of Biomedical Optics
|July 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intermediate tissue oxygen level is required to observe murine FLASH skin sparing.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Cherenkov emission in realistic optical body phantoms to study effects of skin tone on imaging delivery technique.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

FLASH effect is diminished by daily fractionation of electron RT in mouse skin.

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

Emerging uses of 5-aminolevulinic-acid-induced protoporphyrin IX in medicine: a review of multifaceted, ubiquitous, molecular diagnostic, therapeutic, and theranostic opportunities.

Journal of biomedical optics·2025
Same author

Pioneer of Biomedical Optics: Brian C. Wilson.

Journal of biomedical optics·2025
Same author

Timescale of FLASH Sparing Effect Determined by Varying Temporal Split of Dose Delivery in Mice.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2025
Same journal

Segmentation-guided photon pooling enables robust single-cell analysis and fast fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same journal

Method of spatial scanning of modulated laser radiation for outline imaging of interphalangeal joints.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same journal

Multimodal optical imaging for the assessment of the teratogenic effects of ethanol on zebrafish development.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same journal

Fluorescence properties of collagen types I-V: a comprehensive study of spectral and lifetime characteristics.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same journal

Spectral dependence of lipofuscin fluorescence lifetimes revealed by FLIM with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same journal

Building the future of biophotonics through experiential education and seasonal schools.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
See all related articles

This study evaluates analytical tools for in vivo optical imaging. Contrast-detail analysis is crucial for deep tissue imaging, revealing minimum detectable sizes and contrast levels for absorption and fluorescent agents.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Science
  • Optical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Standard resolution testing is suitable for hardware evaluation with infinite contrast.
  • Deep tissue optical imaging in vivo presents challenges requiring advanced analysis methods.
  • Contrast agents (absorption or fluorescent) are vital for visualizing biological tissues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize and demonstrate three major analytical tools for in vivo optical imaging.
  • To evaluate the performance of these tools in medical imaging contexts.
  • To quantify the effectiveness of diffuse optical imaging of tissue.

Main Methods:

  • Standard resolution testing for hardware evaluation.
  • Contrast-detail analysis for deep tissue imaging of contrast agents.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Location ROC (LROC) curve analysis for human observer performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Contrast-detail analysis indicates minimum detectable sizes are ~1/10th of object diameter and minimum detectable contrast is 10-20% for centrally located objects.
    • Detection limits for size and contrast decrease as heterogeneous regions approach the surface.
    • ROC and LROC curves are standard for assessing human observer performance in detecting abnormalities.

    Conclusions:

    • The three analytical tools—resolution testing, contrast-detail analysis, and ROC/LROC analysis—are essential for evaluating in vivo optical imaging systems.
    • Contrast-detail analysis provides critical metrics for deep tissue imaging performance.
    • These methods collectively enable robust quantification and optimization of optical imaging techniques in medical applications.