Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Generation and context memory.

Neil W Mulligan1, Jeffrey P Lozito, Zachary A Rosner

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USA. nmulligan@unc.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|July 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Research on "the testing effect" routinely conflates direct and forward testing effects: A meta-analysis of testing effects with free recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Why does experimental design moderate the effect of judgment of learning (JOL) reactivity?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Putting Emotional Memories in Context: The Constructionist Model of Emotional Memory.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Four (and a Half) Preregistered Failures to Replicate the Weapon Focus Effect in Online Samples.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2025
Same author

Does processing level at retrieval moderate the testing effect? Evidence of an asymmetry between study-based encoding and retrieval-based encoding.

Memory (Hove, England)·2025
Same author

Attention and the forward testing effect.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Generating items can improve memory for the item itself but may harm memory for its context. This study shows the negative generation effect impacts perceptual details, not broader context, and depends on processing type.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Studies

Background:

  • The generation effect typically enhances memory recall for generated items.
  • Previous research suggests generation might negatively impact memory for contextual details.
  • This study investigates the nuances of the negative generation effect in context memory.

Discussion:

  • The negative generation effect specifically impacts memory for perceptual attributes (e.g., color, font) of a target item.
  • Nonvisual generation tasks (semantic or nonsemantic) yield this effect, while visual tasks do not disrupt context memory.
  • Generating nonwords affects item memory differently than context memory, dissociating these effects.

Key Insights:

  • The negative generation effect is not driven by semantic encoding processes.
  • Context memory impairment is separable from item memory enhancement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A modified processing account distinguishing visual and nonvisual processing better explains the findings.

    • Outlook:

    • Further research can explore the precise mechanisms underlying visual versus nonvisual processing in memory.
    • Investigating the boundary conditions of the negative generation effect across different memory types is warranted.
    • This work contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of memory encoding and retrieval processes.