Related Experiment Videos
High sensitivity C-reactive protein and cardiovascular disease: an association built on unstable foundations?
1Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK. nsattar@clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Insights
C-reactive protein (CRP) was once thought to be a strong predictor of vascular events. However, recent studies show CRP has limited predictive value and recommend focusing on established risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Inflammation Research
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- The inflammatory hypothesis of vascular disease highlights the role of inflammation in plaque development and instability.
- C-reactive protein (CRP) has been investigated as a key inflammatory marker for predicting vascular events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive value of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) concentrations for vascular events.
- To assess the utility of CRP in risk factor stratification for coronary heart disease (CHD).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of recent large-scale studies examining CRP concentrations and vascular event prediction.
- Review of evidence regarding CRP's role in atherogenesis and its short-term variability.
Main Results:
- Recent evidence indicates CRP is approximately half as predictive of vascular events as previously reported.
- CRP measurements offer minimal additional predictive value to existing CHD risk prediction models.
- Short-term variability of CRP levels poses challenges for reliable risk screening.
Conclusions:
- The clinical focus for determining and reducing CHD risk should remain on established factors like smoking, lipids, and blood pressure.
- Current evidence does not support the routine use of CRP for risk factor stratification in vascular disease management.
Abstract:
There is considerable interest in the inflammatory hypothesis of vascular disease. Markers of inflammation predict vascular events, and inflammatory cells and molecules are critical elements within plaques and are especially prominent in unstable lesions. With respect to screening, concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP), as determined by high-sensitivity assays, have been consistently shown to predict myocardial infarction and other vascular events independently of traditional risk factors. As a result, some authorities proposed potential inclusion of CRP in risk factor stratification. However, more recent evidence in the last two years from larger studies suggests that CRP concentrations are only around as half as predictive for vascular events as suggested in earlier reports. Furthermore, it now appears as if CRP measurements add little additional predictive value to current coronary heart disease risk prediction charts. The short-term variability of CRP is also problematic for risk factor screening. At the same time, other recent evidence questions the proposed causal role of CRP in atherogenesis. Therefore, the current focus in clinical practice should remain on established risk factors (e.g. smoking, lipids and blood pressure), both to determine coronary heart disease risk and to reduce it.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies