ICSI: hype or hazard?

Ever since its introduction in clinical practice more than 10 years ago, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been the subject of ongoing debate regarding its indications and safety. ICSI is hyped because of its potential to give couples with severe male factor infertility a chance to conceive, and because of its apparently low fertilization failure rate compared with 'classic' in vitro fertilization (IVF). Concerns about ICSI are related to technical, biological and genetic hazards. ICSI has been branded 'the ultimate rape of the oocyte', as the oocyte membrane is mechanically pierced, appearing to bypass all biological and genetic selection. ICSI has been linked in a number of reports to an increased incidence of chromosomal anomalies, congenital abnormalities and perinatal hazards in offspring conceived with this technique. The etiology of the increased risk of chromosomal anomalies in ICSI offspring, especially sex-chromosome anomalies, is thought to be partly multifactorial, partly andrological, related to paternal karyotypic abnormalities and/or abnormal sperm. The majority of studies on ICSI and IVF offspring have, setting aside inconsistencies in methodology and classification, not shown significant differences between the two techniques in terms of congenital abnormalities, however, compared to naturally conceived offspring there does show an increased risk. This risk is attributed mainly to parental factors such as maternal age, poor sperm quality and infertility as an independent risk factor. Perinatal hazards may include low birth weight and perinatal mortality. Behavioural and psychological development is carefully monitored in ICSI and IVF children with no significant differences to the development of naturally conceived children, but many factors are involved including demographics. Follow-up studies are essential to the technique of ICSI. It is our duty to inform patients of the concerns and benefits to this treatment, based on the latest data available.