Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can meta-analyses be trusted?

S G Thompson1, S J Pocock

  • 1Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

Lancet (London, England)
|November 2, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Meta-analyses offer valuable insights but require cautious interpretation. Statistical challenges like heterogeneity mean results should guide, not dictate, clinical practice.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Value of risk scores in the decision to palliate patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

The British journal of surgery·2018
Same author

Lessons learned about prevalence and growth rates of abdominal aortic aneurysms from a 25-year ultrasound population screening programme.

The British journal of surgery·2017
Same author

Sex differences in mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the UK.

The British journal of surgery·2017
Same author

Meta-analysis of the current prevalence of screen-detected abdominal aortic aneurysm in women.

The British journal of surgery·2016
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of the National Health Service Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Programme in England.

The British journal of surgery·2014
Same author

Long-term cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on four randomized clinical trials.

The British journal of surgery·2014
Same journal

Medical compartmentalisation: a patient with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in Japan.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

[<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-edotreotide versus everolimus for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (COMPETE): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Research priorities for characterising Bundibugyo virus.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Rethinking treatment sequence in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Dual mobility total hip replacement in fractures: stability promotes patient confidence.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Dual mobility versus standard cups in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures (Duality): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled, superiority trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Statistics
  • Evidence Synthesis

Background:

  • Meta-analyses are increasingly popular but face skepticism.
  • Concerns exist regarding statistical methodologies and practical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Critically evaluate the statistical conduct and interpretation of meta-analyses.
  • Promote informed discussion on the utility and limitations of meta-analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of statistical issues in meta-analysis.
  • Focus on heterogeneity and extrapolation of findings.

Main Results:

  • Meta-analysis is not an exact science yielding simple answers.
  • Statistical heterogeneity poses significant interpretation challenges.

Conclusions:

  • Meta-analysis is a descriptive tool, not a definitive solver of complex problems.
  • Quantitative meta-analysis findings necessitate cautious clinical interpretation.