Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laser beam shaping profiles and propagation.

David L Shealy1, John A Hoffnagle

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Alabama, AL 35216-1170, USA. dls@uab.edu

Applied Optics
|July 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Four flattened irradiance profiles (super-Gaussian, flattened Gaussian, Fermi-Dirac, super-Lorentzian) were compared. Matched profiles showed minimal differences in diffraction patterns, indicating similar beam propagation for beam shaping optics.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a Monitoring System for Semicontinuous Measurements of Stable Carbon Isotope Ratios in Atmospheric Carbonaceous Aerosols: Optimized Methods and Application to Field Measurements.

Analytical chemistry·2020
Same author

Refracting the k-function: Stavroudis's solution to the eikonal equation for multielement optical systems.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2011
Same author

Wavefront and caustics of a plane wave refracted by an arbitrary surface.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2008
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Optics and Photonics
  • Laser Beam Characterization

Background:

  • Flattened irradiance profiles are crucial for applications like laser material processing.
  • Super-Gaussian, flattened Gaussian, Fermi-Dirac, and super-Lorentzian functions are commonly used to model these profiles.
  • Quantitative comparison of these profile functions is needed for effective optical system design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine shape and width parameters for four flattened irradiance profile functions.
  • To establish the relationship between parameters for profiles with matched radius and slope.
  • To compare the propagation characteristics of these matched profiles.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical determination of shape and width parameters for super-Gaussian, flattened Gaussian, Fermi-Dirac, and super-Lorentzian functions.
  • Analysis of the functional relationship between parameters for matched profiles.
  • Application of Kirchhoff-Fresnel diffraction theory and M2 analysis to evaluate beam propagation.

Main Results:

  • Implicit functional relationships were derived for shape and width parameters of matched profiles.
  • Diffraction patterns for the four profile families showed only minor differences during propagation.
  • These differences were found to be potentially indistinguishable experimentally.

Conclusions:

  • Beam shaping optics designed to produce any of these four flattened irradiance profiles with matched parameters will result in similar beam propagation.
  • The choice of profile function has minimal impact on the propagated irradiance distribution when parameters are matched.
  • This provides a robust basis for selecting profile functions in optical design.

Related Experiment Videos