Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
Published on: April 27, 2021
The Miandad effect reconsidered: analysis of Pakistan's cricket performance 1952 to 2005
Martin Voracek1, Anton K Formann
1Department of Basic Psychological Research, School of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria. martin.voracek@univie.ac.at
Abstract:
In 2004 Abbasi and Khan reported an enduring influence of a 1986 Pakistani landmark victory in cricket over India on subsequent matches up to 2003. The present study reconsidered the significance and the specificity of this phenomenon, denoted as the "Miandad effect." All 659 Pakistani cricket encounters with India and other frequently played opponents up to 2005 which yielded a winning team were included in the analysis. The increase in matches won by Pakistan over India in the post-1986 period was statistically not significant. Changes in match performance against other frequently played nations, namely, increases against England and the West Indies as well as decreases against Australia and Sri Lanka, were larger than the one seen with India. Apparently, the Miandad effect neither generalized to all recurrently encountered opponents, nor was specific to India.
Insights
The "Miandad effect" in cricket, suggesting a 1986 Pakistani victory over India influenced future matches, was re-examined. This study found no significant impact on Pakistan
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Cricket Performance Analysis
- Statistical Modeling in Sports
Background:
- A 2004 study by Abbasi and Khan proposed the "Miandad effect," an enduring influence of Pakistan's 1986 victory over India on subsequent cricket matches.
- This effect suggested a psychological or performance-based advantage stemming from a specific historical event.
- The original study's findings prompted further investigation into the phenomenon's validity and scope.
Purpose of the Study:
- To statistically re-evaluate the significance and specificity of the proposed "Miandad effect."
- To determine if the alleged impact of the 1986 victory extended beyond matches against India.
- To analyze Pakistan's cricket performance trends against various opponents post-1986.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 659 Pakistani cricket matches against India and other frequent opponents up to 2005.
- Inclusion criteria focused on matches where Pakistan emerged as the winning team.
- Statistical significance testing was applied to assess changes in win rates before and after 1986.
Main Results:
- The increase in matches won by Pakistan against India in the post-1986 period was found to be statistically insignificant.
- Pakistan's performance changes against other nations (e.g., England, West Indies, Australia, Sri Lanka) showed larger variations than against India.
- Performance shifts against other opponents included increases against England and the West Indies, and decreases against Australia and Sri Lanka.
Conclusions:
- The "Miandad effect" does not appear to be a generalized phenomenon applicable to all of Pakistan's frequently encountered cricket opponents.
- The effect is not specific to matches played against India, as performance changes against other nations were more pronounced.
- The study suggests that the purported influence of the 1986 victory on subsequent cricket outcomes is not statistically supported.
Related Concept Videos
Halo Effect
Regression Toward the Mean
Social Facilitation
Actor-Observer Effect
Hindsight Biases
Cause and Effect