Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pathways to mutualism breakdown.

Joel L Sachs1, Ellen L Simms

  • 1University of California - Berkeley, Department of Integrative Biology, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. jlsachs@berkeley.edu

Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|July 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aeschynomene americana induces terminal bacteroid differentiation in Bradyrhizobium sp. USDA3516, a novel model for dalbergioid-rhizobium symbiosis.

BMC plant biology·2026
Same author

Growth Response of Crop Legumes to Soil Microbiota Is Linked With Soil Nutrients and Planting History.

Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Chromosome-level reference genome of a foundational California native legume, Acmispon strigosus.

The Journal of heredity·2026
Same author

Nitrogen fertilization nullifies host sanctions against non-fixing rhizobia and drives divestment from symbiosis in <i>Lotus japonicus</i>.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Non-Nitrogen-Fixing <i>Sinorhizobium meliloti</i> Can Escape Sanctions in Indeterminate Alfalfa Nodules, Exhibiting Parasitic Growth.

Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI·2025
Same author

Host control by Acmispon strigosus constrains fitness gains of ineffective Bradyrhizobium symbionts in mixed infections.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2024
Same journal

Can habitat modification in the native range promote invasion?

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

The host-microbiome dimension of ecological regime shifts.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

The emerging field of wild animal welfare science.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Integrating nutritional mutualists into the evolution of defense.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Formation of three great Asian plateaus, climate change, and biodiversity: (Trends Ecol. Evol. 40, 970-982; 2025).

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Digital twins as a tool for ecosystem research.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
See all related articles

Mutualistic interactions are common but often thought unstable. New research shows reversions to autonomy, not parasitism, are a frequent outcome for these ecological partnerships.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Systematics

Background:

  • Mutualisms, interactions benefiting all partners, are widespread in nature.
  • Despite their prevalence, mutualisms are often considered unstable and prone to breakdown.
  • Previous research has primarily focused on theoretical models of mutualism instability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically investigate the commonality of mutualism breakdown.
  • To explore the evolutionary trajectories of mutualistic relationships.
  • To assess whether mutualisms frequently evolve into parasitic or autonomous states.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing recent advancements in molecular systematics.
  • Constructing novel phylogenetic trees based on molecular data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing the placement of parasitic and autonomous taxa within ancestrally mutualistic clades.

    • Main Results:

    • Phylogenetic analyses reveal that parasitic and autonomous taxa are nested within clades that were ancestrally mutualistic.
    • Contrary to some models, transitions from mutualism to parasitism appear to be relatively infrequent.
    • Reversions to autonomous lifestyles (where species no longer engage in mutualism) are observed across diverse systems.

    Conclusions:

    • Mutualism breakdown is empirically testable and occurs in nature.
    • The evolution of autonomy represents a common, yet underappreciated, endpoint for mutualistic interactions.
    • Understanding the dynamics of mutualism breakdown offers new insights into the stability and evolution of ecological partnerships.