Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cancer cachexia--a clinical entity?

T W Lennard1, A J Rich, P D Wright

  • 1Department of Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.

Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
|April 1, 1983
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aprepitant is a novel, selective activator of the K2P channel TRAAK.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2021
Same author

Analysis of USP Organic Volatile Impurities and Thirteen Other Common Residual Solvents by Static Headspace Analysis.

Analytical chemistry·2011
Same author

Whole blood pumping with a microthrottle pump.

Biomicrofluidics·2011
Same author

A junior doctor's view of postgraduate medical education in the EEC.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Facial expression in acute appendicitis.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2009
Same author

The use of significant event analysis and personal development plans in developing CPD: a pilot study.

British dental journal·2007
Same journal

Association of preoperative chyme reinfusion via percutaneous endoscopic colostomy with post-reversal Fluid independence in short bowel syndrome patients with an end jejunostomy and an intact but defunctionalized colon.

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same journal

Intradialytic nutritional intake and adherence perspective of a national and continuous meal model in a large hemodialysis patient cohort.

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same journal

Nutritional screening within the GLIM procedure-Part 2: Operationalization of the concept risk of malnutrition using a modified Delphi procedure.

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same journal

Nutritional screening within the GLIM procedure-Part 1: Development of a conceptual definition of risk of malnutrition using a modified Delphi procedure.

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same journal

Impact of intestinal resections on the secretion of gastrointestinal hormones.

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
Same journal

Association of phosphate decline after nutritional support with extubation failure in critically ill patients.

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2026
See all related articles

Cancer cachexia, a metabolic condition, presents differently from simple undernutrition. Standard nutritional assessments failed to detect significant differences in body composition between cancer patients and undernourished individuals without cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Metabolic Disorders
  • Nutritional Science

Background:

  • Metabolic abnormalities in cancer can alter tissue loss patterns, distinguishing cancer cachexia from simple undernutrition.
  • Cancer cachexia may present unique characteristics compared to malnutrition in non-cancer patients.
  • Detecting these differences through clinical methods is a key research area.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if standard nutritional assessment methods can differentiate cancer cachexia from simple undernutrition.
  • To compare body composition indicators between cancer patients and undernourished cancer-free individuals.

Main Methods:

  • Seven standard nutritional assessment measurements were taken prior to treatment.
  • Measurements included body weight percentage, arm muscle circumference, triceps skinfold, plasma protein, albumin, transferrin, and lymphocyte count.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data were collected from 72 cancer patients and 89 undernourished cancer-free patients.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences were found between the cancer cachexia group and the simple undernutrition group for any of the seven nutritional assessment parameters.
    • Parameters assessed included body weight, muscle circumference, skinfold thickness, plasma proteins (albumin, transferrin), and lymphocyte count.

    Conclusions:

    • Standard nutritional assessment methods are insufficient to detect differences in body composition between cancer cachexia and simple undernutrition.
    • Further research is needed to identify specific markers or methods for distinguishing cancer cachexia from general undernutrition.