Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Memory editing: Knowledge, criteria, and alignment.

Timothy N Odegard1, James M Lampinen

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington, TX 76019-0528, USA. odegard@uta.edu

Memory (Hove, England)
|July 11, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sentence repetition as a potential indicator of broader language difficulty in students with dyslexia: A pilot study.

Annals of dyslexia·2026
Same author

Literacy legislation in practice: implementation, impact, and emerging lessons.

Annals of dyslexia·2025
Same author

Feasibility of an online module to prepare pre-service teachers to serve students with dyslexia.

Annals of dyslexia·2025
Same author

The science of reading meets the science of learning: memory systems, structured literacy, and the role of AI.

Annals of dyslexia·2025
Same author

Dyslexia in the 21st century: revisiting the consensus definition.

Annals of dyslexia·2024
Same author

The gift of dyslexia: what is the harm in it?

Annals of dyslexia·2024

This study proposes a framework for memory editing mechanisms, hypothesizing they rely on knowledge, criteria, and alignment. Evidence from memory research supports this model, outlining future research directions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Studies

Background:

  • Memory editing is a complex cognitive process.
  • Existing models of memory editing lack a unifying framework.
  • Understanding memory mechanisms is crucial for cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a general organizational framework for memory editing.
  • To propose a hypothesis that memory editing is based on three independent constructs: knowledge, criteria, and alignment.
  • To review supporting evidence for this framework.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of general memory editing research.
  • Specific analysis of studies within the special issue of Memory.
  • Synthesis of evidence to support the proposed framework.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A proposed organizational framework for memory editing.
  • Identification of knowledge, criteria, and alignment as key independent constructs.
  • Compilation of supporting evidence from existing and special issue literature.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework offers a structured approach to understanding memory editing.
  • Further research is needed to explore the interplay of knowledge, criteria, and alignment.
  • Future research directions in memory editing are outlined.