Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy.

Carter Q Le1, Matthew T Gettman

  • 1Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Gonda 7S, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. le.carter@mayo.edu

Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
|July 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Radical retropubic prostatectomy, a traditional method, shows comparable short-term outcomes to minimally invasive laparoscopic prostatectomy. Longer-term data are needed to assess oncological efficacy, functional results, and costs for these prostate cancer surgeries.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Salvage lymph node dissection in oligo-recurrent prostate cancer patients: Mapping patterns of recurrence and factors associated with disease progression.

Urologic oncology·2026
Same author

Whose Hands on the Robot? Rethinking Roles in Nerve Sheath Tumor Surgery.

World neurosurgery·2026
Same author

The Impact of Open Surgical Team Consistency on Oncologic and Functional Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2025
Same author

Enhancing Accuracy of Operative Reports with Automated Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Surgical Video.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2025
Same author

Methylated DNA Markers in Voided Urine for the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Reply to Letter to the Editor on "Predictors of Excellent Urology Residents at the Time of the Urology Match".

Urology·2024

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Radical retropubic prostatectomy is the established standard for prostate cancer surgery.
  • Minimally invasive techniques, including laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and da Vinci robotic-assisted prostatectomy (RARP), have emerged to reduce surgical morbidity.
  • Comparisons between open and minimally invasive prostatectomy show similar short-term perioperative results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare perioperative outcomes, oncological efficacy, functional results, and costs of traditional open prostatectomy versus minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic approaches.
  • To evaluate the current evidence on short-term functional outcomes (urinary continence, sexual function) and long-term oncological data for different surgical methods.
  • To identify the need for longer-term studies to determine the optimal surgical approach for prostate cancer treatment.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and comparison of existing studies on open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies.
  • Analysis of perioperative outcomes, including morbidity and recovery.
  • Evaluation of short-term functional outcomes (urinary continence, sexual function) and available long-term oncological data.
  • Cost analysis comparing the different surgical modalities.

Main Results:

  • Perioperative outcomes are comparable between open and minimally invasive prostatectomy techniques.
  • Short-term functional outcomes, such as urinary continence and sexual function, appear similar across all approaches.
  • Long-term oncological data are well-established for open prostatectomy but limited for laparoscopic and robotic methods.
  • Current cost analysis indicates that open surgery is more cost-effective, with da Vinci-assisted prostatectomy being the most expensive.

Conclusions:

  • Minimally invasive prostatectomy techniques offer comparable short-term perioperative and functional outcomes to open surgery.
  • Longer-term oncological data are crucial for a definitive comparison of efficacy between open and minimally invasive prostatectomy.
  • Further research is needed to establish the optimal balance between morbidity, oncological control, functional recovery, and cost for radical prostatectomy approaches.