A retrospective postlicensure survey of FEIBA efficacy and safety

D Dimichele1, C Négrier

  • 1New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10021, USA. dmdimich@med.cornell.edu

Patients with haemophilia who develop inhibitors have unique treatment needs; bypassing agents such as Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity, Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex (FEIBA; Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria) are part of this therapeutic armamentarium. This study sought to increase comprehension of the full therapeutic profile of FEIBA by evaluating its safety and efficacy in the settings of acute bleeding, surgery, and prophylaxis. Information was collected through a postmarketing surveillance study; questionnaire booklets were distributed to 72 treatment centers in the United States and Europe. The booklets contained questions related to patient demographics, inhibitor titre determinations, and FEIBA treatment. Information comprising 200 FEIBA treatment periods and representing >4500 infusions was available for 63 patients with inhibitors (n = 60, haemophilia A; n = 3, haemophilia B). Twelve patients were in more than one treatment group. Efficacy was determined by a subjective global evaluation and was good or excellent in 82% of all acute, and 91% of all surgical, treatments. Additionally, prophylactic treatment resulted in improved or stabilised clinical orthopaedic status in 11 of 13 patients (85%). Based on available data, FEIBA was judged safe in all treatment situations by the small number of adverse events (<0.04%). No thrombotic complications occurred during any treatment episode. Results indicated that FEIBA was safe and effective in acute, surgical, and prophylactic treatment settings, supporting the utility of FEIBA as a treatment option for patients with inhibitors. However, prospective studies are advised.

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
Pharmacovigilance01:19

Pharmacovigilance

Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview01:26

Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview

Drugs, the chemical agents used in diagnosing, treating, or preventing diseases, undergo a four-phase process of development: pharmaceutic, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and therapeutic.
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...