Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Immediate and early replacement implants and restorations.

Richard M Palmer1, Paul J Palmer, Paul Baker

  • 1Implant Dentistry and Periodontology, KCL Dental Institute, Guy's Hospital Campus, London SE1 9RT, UK.

Dental Update
|July 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Major bone loss at elective aseptic revision of a primary total knee replacement is uncommon, but intraoperative defects are frequently underestimated pre-operatively.

The Knee·2026
Same author

Hypothermia risk factors in patients with burns during emergency presentations: protocol for a retrospective cohort study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of polyhexanide, chlorhexidine with neomycin and mupirocin for nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) decolonisation: non-inferiority RCT (TIDE).

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Characterizing the Crosswind Structure of Artificial Seawater Droplet Plumes during a Sea Trial on the Great Barrier Reef.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same author

Evaluating the impact of revision knee arthroplasty networks in England: an analysis of temporal trends in referral patterns, surgical volumes and early outcomes using hospital episode statistics data for England between 2012 and 2024.

The Knee·2025
Same author

High early complication risk but low risk of re-revision beyond 5 years following revision knee arthroplasty in the elderly: An analysis of 2833 cases using real-world data from an international database.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2025
Same journal

Technique Tips – Iatrogenesis and How to Prevent It.

Dental update·2017
Same journal

Clinical Challenges Q&A 31. Painful Lip.

Dental update·2017
Same journal

Dual Role of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafting in Regeneration of Periodontal Attachment Apparatus.

Dental update·2017
Same journal

Ceramic Fracture in Metal-Ceramic Restorations: The Aetiology.

Dental update·2017
Same journal

Arteriovenous Malformation of the Jaws: a Black Hole for the GDP – A Case Report.

Dental update·2017
Same journal

The Immune System: Basis of so much Health and Disease: 4. Immunocytes.

Dental update·2017
See all related articles

Rapid dental implant protocols can shorten treatment time but require careful control to ensure successful, long-term results. Clinicians should choose methods balancing speed with high success rates and patient aesthetics.

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Oral Surgery
  • Implantology

Background:

  • Dental implant treatment protocols have evolved rapidly.
  • Techniques aim to reduce the time between implant placement and restoration.
  • Implants can be placed immediately after extraction or after a healing period.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the advantages and disadvantages of various dental implant treatment protocols.
  • To highlight the importance of controlled early restoration and loading.
  • To guide clinicians in selecting appropriate treatment strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current dental implant treatment protocols.
  • Analysis of immediate vs. delayed implant placement techniques.
  • Evaluation of early restoration and loading considerations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Rapid protocols offer reduced treatment duration.
  • Careful control is essential to prevent implant failure and complications.
  • Technique selection depends on achieving functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Clinicians must prioritize high success rates and long-term functional and aesthetic implant restorations.
  • Rapid protocols are viable when they do not compromise treatment goals.
  • Clinician experience is crucial for successful application of accelerated techniques.