Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

06:11
Measuring Biomethane Potential of Food Scrap Waste Anaerobically Co-Digested with Waste-Activated Sludge Using Respirometry
Published on: April 26, 2024
First-order kinetic gas generation model parameters for wet landfills
Ayman A Faour1, Debra R Reinhart, Huaxin You
1University of Central Florida, P.O. Box 162445, Orlando, FL 32816-2445, USA.
Waste Management (New York, N.Y.)
|July 18, 2006
Summary
This study refines the US EPA Landfill Gas Emissions Model (LandGEM) by analyzing wet landfill data. It provides updated parameters for methane generation potential and reaction rates, improving landfill gas collection predictions.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Waste Management Science
Background:
- Accurate landfill gas (LFG) emission modeling is crucial for environmental protection and energy recovery.
- The US EPA Landfill Gas Emissions Model (LandGEM) is a widely used tool for LFG estimation.
- Wet landfill conditions present unique challenges for LFG modeling due to variations in moisture content and decomposition rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze landfill gas collection data from wet landfill cells.
- To estimate first-order gas generation model parameters for the US EPA LandGEM.
- To assess the model's fit and provide refined parameter estimates for improved LFG prediction.
Main Methods:
- Collected and analyzed landfill gas collection data from various wet landfill cells.
- Employed statistical comparisons between predicted and actual gas collection to determine model parameters.
- Utilized mixed-effects model regression and bootstrap analysis for parameter estimation and confidence intervals.
- Incorporated a lag phase into the LandGEM model analysis.
Main Results:
- The US EPA LandGEM model demonstrated a good fit to the collected data when a lag phase (average 1.5 years) was included.
- Estimated mean parameter values for short-term waste placement and long-term data: V(sto) = 33 m³/Mg, L(o) = 76 m³/Mg, and k = 0.28 year⁻¹.
- Estimated parameters for three full-scale wet landfills varied: k values ranged from 0.11 to 0.21 year⁻¹ and L(o) values ranged from 87 to 115 m³/Mg.
- Suggested conservative parameter estimates (k = 0.3 year⁻¹, L(o) = 100 m³/Mg) for optimized design and minimized lag phase.
Conclusions:
- The LandGEM model is effective for modeling LFG from wet landfills, especially with the inclusion of a lag phase.
- The study provides valuable, data-driven parameter estimates for LandGEM, enhancing its accuracy for wet landfill conditions.
- Optimizing landfill design to minimize the lag phase can lead to more conservative and reliable LFG emission predictions.

