Related Experiment Videos
Ureteral stents: coil strength and durometer
Kari Hendlin1, Kelly Dockendorf, Christina Horn
1Department of Urologic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0392, USA.
Urology
|July 18, 2006
Summary
Ureteral stent coil strength and stiffness vary significantly, impacting performance and comfort. Post-urine exposure, some stents weakened considerably, while others maintained strength, highlighting material variability.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Urology
- Medical Device Engineering
Background:
- Double-J ureteral stents are crucial for urinary tract drainage.
- Stent coil strength and stiffness are biomechanical properties influencing performance and patient comfort.
- Limited data exists on how urine exposure affects these properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the coil strength of ureteral stents before and after urine exposure.
- To measure the stiffness (Young's modulus) of various ureteral stents.
- To correlate these biomechanical properties with stent performance and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Twelve 6F ureteral stents underwent coil strength testing before and after 30 days of urine exposure.
- Coil strength was assessed by measuring recoil force after insertion into bologna.
- Tensile strength and stiffness (Young's modulus) were evaluated using a universal testing machine.
Main Results:
- Coil strength varied significantly among stent models and after urine exposure.
- Cook Black Silicone and Cook C-Flex showed highest initial coil strength but greatest post-exposure decrease.
- Cook C-Flex was the stiffest stent (E=1472 KPa), while Cook Black Silicone was least stiff (E=122 KPa).
- Stent stiffness consistency varied, with Circon Double J and Bard InLay showing reliable values across batches.
Conclusions:
- Ureteral stent coil strength and stiffness are key differentiating factors.
- These properties significantly impact stent performance and patient comfort.
- Variability in stiffness suggests potential quality control issues in manufacturing, complicating comparisons.