Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predictive testing for complex diseases using multiple genes: fact or fiction?

A Cecile J W Janssens1, Yurii S Aulchenko, Stefano Elefante

  • 1Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.janssens@erasmusmc.nl

Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
|July 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Societal implications of expanded universal carrier screening: a scoping review.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2022
Same author

Improving reporting standards for polygenic scores in risk prediction studies.

Nature·2021
Same author

Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2021
Same author

Do we measure or compute polygenic risk scores? Why language matters.

Human genetics·2021
Same author

Personalizing Breast Cancer Screening Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2020
Same author

ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 2. The ROC plot: the picture that could be worth a 1000 words.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2020
Same journal

Bridging the Functional Gap by Synergy of Exome/Genome and RNA Sequencing: A Systematic Semi-quantitative Review Demonstrating Enhanced Diagnostic Yield in Genetic Diagnostics.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same journal

Characterization of the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum of TCF7L2-related neurodevelopmental disorder (TRND).

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same journal

Surveillance adherence and clinical findings in children with confirmed or familial TP53 variants: the Swedish multicenter constitutional TP53 study (SWEP53).

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same journal

Extended newborn screening using DNA methylation testing for fragile X syndrome in 17,107 infants.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same journal

Response to Himanshu Goel.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Electrical Impedance Myography as a Noninvasive Musculoskeletal Biomarker in Infantile- and Late-Onset Pompe Disease.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
See all related articles

Simultaneously testing multiple susceptibility genes offers high to excellent accuracy in identifying disease risk. Genetic profiling

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Debate exists on the clinical utility of testing multiple low-risk genes.
  • Assessing the value of polygenic risk scores is crucial for healthcare.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the usefulness of multiple genetic testing using simulated data.
  • To evaluate the discriminative accuracy of genetic profiling.

Main Methods:

  • Area Under the Curve (AUC) was used to measure accuracy.
  • Simulated data analyzed factors like gene number, allele frequency, and odds ratios.
  • Proportion of variance explained approximated heritability.

Main Results:

  • High to excellent discriminative accuracy (AUC > 0.80 to > 0.95) achieved with multiple gene testing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Increased accuracy observed when genetic factors contribute more significantly to disease (higher proportion of variance explained).
  • Maximum discriminative accuracy can be estimated from disease heritability and prevalence.

    • Conclusions:

    • Genetic profiling shows potential for identifying individuals at higher disease risk.
    • The effectiveness of genetic profiling is contingent on disease prevalence and heritability.