Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Modelling the economic and health consequences of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the UK
J Jaime Caro1, Shien Guo, Alexandra Ward
1Caro Research Institute, Concord, MA, USA.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) significantly reduces mortality and hospitalizations in advanced heart failure patients. This cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK suggests CRT offers substantial health benefits at a reasonable cost per QALY gained.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
- Medical Technology Assessment
Background:
- Clinical evidence supports Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) for advanced heart failure.
- The cost-effectiveness of CRT in the UK remains unclear for patients with NYHA class III-IV heart failure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the economic and health consequences of implanting CRT in UK patients with advanced heart failure.
- To determine the cost-effectiveness of CRT compared to optimum pharmacologic treatment (OPT) alone.
Main Methods:
- A discrete event simulation model of heart failure was employed over a 5-year period.
- Data from the CARE-HF trial and a UK hospital informed model inputs.
- Direct medical costs from a National Health Service perspective were analyzed, with costs and benefits discounted at 3.5%.
Main Results:
- CRT was predicted to reduce mortality by 26% and hospitalizations by 22% over 5 years.
- The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for CRT was estimated at £15,247 per QALY gained.
- Sensitivity analyses indicated the results were most sensitive to time horizon and implantation costs.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy is projected to provide significant health benefits for advanced heart failure patients.
- The analysis suggests CRT offers a reasonable cost-effectiveness ratio in the UK context.
Objective:
Clinical evidence supports the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in advanced heart failure, but its cost-effectiveness is still unclear. This analysis assessed the economic and health consequences in the UK of implanting a CRT in patients with NYHA class III-IV heart failure.
Methods:
A discrete event simulation of heart failure was used to compare the course over 5 years of 1000 identical pairs of patients -- one receiving both CRT and optimum pharmacologic treatment (OPT), the other OPT alone. All inputs were obtained from the data collected in the CArdiac REsynchronization in Heart Failure (CARE-HF) trial and a hospital in the UK. Direct medical costs (in 2004 pound) from the perspective of the National Health Service were considered. Both costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5%. Sensitivity analyses addressed all model inputs and multivariate analyses were performed by varying key parameters simultaneously.
Results:
The model predicted 471 deaths and 2263 hospitalizations over 5 years with OPT alone and 348 deaths and 1764 hospitalizations with CRT, equivalent to a 26% reduction in mortality and 22% in hospitalizations, at a discounted cost of pound 11,423 per patient with CRT vs. pound 4,900 with OPT alone. CRT was predicted to increase quality-adjusted survival by 0.43 QALYs per patient, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of pound 15,247 per QALY gained (range: pound 12,531- pound 23,184). Sensitivity analyses revealed that this outcome was most sensitive to time horizon and cost of implantation.
Conclusion:
Based on these 5-year analyses, CRT is expected to yield substantial health benefits at a reasonable cost.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

