Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes
Toril Kolås1, Ola D Saugstad, Anne K Daltveit
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway. toril.kolas@sykehuset-innlandet.no
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to examine neonatal outcomes among women with a planned cesarean and a planned vaginal delivery at term.
Study Design:
This prospective survey was conducted on 18,653 singleton deliveries that represent 24 maternity units during a 6-month period. The data were retrieved from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and analyzed according to intended mode of delivery.
Results:
Compared with planned vaginal deliveries, planned cesarean delivery increased transfer rates to the neonatal intensive care unit from 5.2% to 9.8% (P < .001). The risk for pulmonary disorders (transient tachypnea of the newborn infant and respiratory distress syndrome) rose from 0.8% to 1.6% (P = .01). There were no significant differences in the risks for low Apgar score and neurologic symptoms.
Conclusion:
A planned cesarean delivery doubled both the rate of transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit and the risk for pulmonary disorders, compared with a planned vaginal delivery.
