Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bioinformatics methods for identifying candidate disease genes.

Marc A van Driel1, Han G Brunner

  • 1Molecular Biology Department, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Human Genomics
|July 20, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Base editing-derived models of human WDR34 and WDR60 disease alleles replicate retrograde intraflagellar transport (IFT) and hedgehog signaling defects.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

A novel spliceosomopathy caused by de novo SF3B3 variants.

Genome medicine·2026
Same author

The clinical and molecular spectrum of the KDM6B-related neurodevelopmental disorder.

American journal of human genetics·2025
Same author

Sex Differences in Prognosis of Patients With Genetic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Circulation. Heart failure·2025
Same author

Publisher Correction: Genomic reanalysis of a pan-European rare-disease resource yields new diagnoses.

Nature medicine·2025
Same author

Reproductive and cognitive phenotypes in carriers of recessive pathogenic variants.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same journal

Mutational spectrum of SLC26A4 and SLC26A5 associated with hereditary hearing loss in Moroccan families.

Human genomics·2026
Same journal

National genomic projects in Asia and Africa: a review.

Human genomics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of whole-exome sequencing data from nearly 10,000 Iranian individuals: identification of recessive mitochondrial disease variants and proposal of a population-specific carrier screening panel.

Human genomics·2026
Same journal

Replicating lipid micelles: a feasible precursor to the origin of life and the earliest appearance of genomes.

Human genomics·2026
Same journal

Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum exhibiting a 46,XY karyotype caused by genome-wide paternal uniparental heterodisomy: a case report.

Human genomics·2026
Same journal

Dynamic responses in the human methylome to exertional heat exhaustion, heat injury, and heat stroke.

Human genomics·2026
See all related articles

Bioinformatics tools help identify disease genes by analyzing genomic data. These in silico prioritization methods improve candidate gene selection, aiding researchers in genetic disease research.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Genomic and functional genomics data are rapidly expanding.
  • Databases are crucial for selecting candidate disease genes.
  • Current candidate gene selection relies on integrating positional, disease, and functional information, often dependent on researcher expertise.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution of disease gene identification methods.
  • To highlight the role of bioinformatics in prioritizing candidate disease genes.
  • To discuss future improvements for in silico prioritization strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing bioinformatics tools and strategies for disease gene identification.
  • Analysis of data integration approaches for candidate gene selection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of factors influencing the enrichment of candidate disease genes.

    • Main Results:

    • Bioinformatics methods have been developed to enhance the prioritization of candidate disease genes.
    • The effectiveness of candidate gene enrichment is influenced by researcher skill.
    • In silico prioritization shows potential for improvement with better datasets and standardization.

    Conclusions:

    • Bioinformatics tools are increasingly vital for efficient disease gene discovery.
    • Standardized ontologies and integrated strategies will further advance in silico prioritization.
    • Completion of datasets and cross-species standardization are key to future improvements in identifying disease-associated genes.