Related Experiment Videos
Informed consent in interventional spine procedures: how much do patients understand?
Clifford R Everett1, Dmitry Novoseletsky, Sarah Cole
1University of Rochester Spine Center, Dept. of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 665, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. Clifford_everett@URMC.Rochester.edu
Pain Physician
|July 20, 2006
Summary
Patients undergoing interventional spine procedures often struggle to recall risks and benefits discussed during informed consent. Providing additional resources, like videos, could improve patient understanding of spinal procedures.
Area of Science:
- Interventional medicine
- Patient education
- Spine procedures
Background:
- Physicians inform patients about treatment options, but patient retention and understanding are poorly understood.
- The informed consent process is crucial for patient autonomy and decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess patient understanding and satisfaction with the informed consent process for interventional spine procedures.
- To identify areas of concern and improve patient comprehension of procedural information.
Main Methods:
- A prospective qualitative interview study was conducted.
- Twenty-five patients undergoing spinal procedures were interviewed.
- Patient concerns regarding informed consent were explored through interviews.
Main Results:
- Patients desired more information on procedure details, risks, benefits, and effective treatments.
- Recall of potential risks and alternatives was often poor.
- Patients suggested video production as a method to enhance understanding.
Conclusions:
- Patients require supplementary information beyond standard discussions and handouts to fully grasp procedure details, risks, benefits, and alternatives.
- Involving family members in the informed consent process may improve overall comprehension.