Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical dilemmas in malaria control.

Andrew Spielman1

  • 1Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Journal of Vector Ecology : Journal of the Society for Vector Ecology
|July 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"<i>See Your Dentist Twice a Year</i>" - What is its origin?

Journal of the history of dentistry·2025
Same author

The Life of a Dental Student: Educational and Social Changes from 1880 to 2020.

Journal of the history of dentistry·2023
Same author

A Model for Teaching History of Dentistry and Medicine to Dental Students - The NYU Experience.

Journal of the history of dentistry·2023
Same author

Teaching History of Dentistry in Dental Curricula A survey of 393 dental schools in 100 countries.

Journal of the history of dentistry·2022
Same author

Diversity in patterns of coital contact of mosquitoes: A scanning electron microscopic study.

Journal of morphology·2018
Same author

How ticks get under your skin: insertion mechanics of the feeding apparatus of Ixodes ricinus ticks.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2013

Effective malaria control requires evaluating outcomes, not just efforts. Combining economic and humanitarian interventions with clear goals ensures sustainable health and wealth cycles for all populations.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Tropical Medicine
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Current malaria control metrics often focus on expended effort rather than achieved outcomes.
  • Existing malaria interventions may be driven by economic incentives or humanitarian objectives, leading to varied target populations and sustainability.
  • The distinction between site-specific (industrial/municipal) and regional (public agency) interventions impacts sustainability and reach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the effectiveness of current malaria control strategies.
  • To differentiate between economic and humanitarian drivers of malaria interventions.
  • To propose a framework for more sustainable and impactful malaria control.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of intervention strategies based on economic versus humanitarian motivations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of progress evaluation methods in malaria control.
  • Examination of sustainability factors in site-specific and regional malaria interventions.

    • Main Results:

    • Malaria control progress is often measured by effort, not impact, due to a lack of irreversible endpoints in planning.
    • Economic interventions may prioritize employed populations, while humanitarian efforts target the neediest, creating disparities in life preservation and sustainable health-wealth cycles.
    • Industry involvement can enhance sustainability through employment opportunities.

    Conclusions:

    • Sustainable malaria control necessitates a dual approach, integrating economically motivated and humanitarian interventions.
    • Realistic, time-limited goals are crucial for deintensification and long-term success.
    • Balancing the needs of the 'richest-of-the-poor' and 'poorest-of-the-poor' is essential for maximizing life preservation and fostering sustainable health and economic development.