Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026
09:40
An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Analysis of stapling versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure
G Beldi1, S A Vorburger, L E Bruegger
1Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland. guido.beldi@insel.ch
The British Journal of Surgery
|July 25, 2006
Summary
Using surgical staplers for appendiceal stump closure in appendicitis cases significantly reduces the risk of surgical site infections and hospital readmissions compared to endoloops.
Area of Science:
- Surgical innovation and patient outcomes
- Gastrointestinal surgery research
- Infection control in surgical procedures
Background:
- Systematic evaluation of appendiceal stump closure methods is lacking.
- Comparison of stapling versus endoloops for stump closure morbidity is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the morbidity associated with appendiceal stump closure using staplers versus endoloops.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different stump closure techniques in reducing postoperative complications.
Main Methods:
- Non-concurrent cohort study utilizing prospectively acquired data.
- Primary outcome: intra-abdominal surgical-site infection rate.
- Secondary outcomes: complications, operative time, hospital stay, readmission rates, and costs.
Main Results:
- Staplers used in 60.5% and endoloops in 39.5% of 6486 appendicitis surgeries (1995-2003).
- For acute appendicitis (4489 patients), stapler group had lower infection rates (0.7% vs 1.7%, P=0.004).
- Stapler group also showed lower readmission rates (0.9% vs 2.1%, P=0.001).
Conclusions:
- Stapler application for appendiceal stump closure in acute appendicitis reduces postoperative intra-abdominal surgical-site infections.
- Using staplers is associated with a decreased need for hospital readmission.
- Surgical stapling offers a potential advantage in managing appendicitis complications.
