Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Parent's Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) detects developmental problems compared to Denver II
Kanjana Theeranate1, Supichaya Chuengchitraks
1Division of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Insights
Parental concerns are vital for identifying child developmental problems. While the Parent's Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) has limitations, parental input significantly aids early detection and intervention.
Area of Science:
- Child Development
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Early Intervention
Background:
- Early detection of developmental and behavioral problems is crucial for effective intervention.
- Pediatrician's skills in eliciting and interpreting clinical information are key to early identification.
- Parents are valuable sources of information regarding their child's development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the utility of parents as sources of clinical information for detecting developmental problems.
- To evaluate the Parent's Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) tool for developmental screening.
- To determine the prevalence of developmental problems in the studied population.
Main Methods:
- A pilot study involving 216 parent-child dyads (children aged 0-72 months).
- Exclusion of chronically ill children or those with known developmental delay.
- Data collection via interviews using the Parent's Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) and administration of the Denver II developmental screening test.
- Comparison of language, fine motor adaptive, and gross motor skills between PEDS and Denver II.
Main Results:
- A 4.1% concern for developmental delay and 3.24% suspected delay by Denver II.
- Significant discrepancies noted between parental concerns and Denver II results.
- PEDS demonstrated a sensitivity of 57.14% and a specificity of 97.6%.
- The agreement between PEDS and Denver II was moderate (Kappa = 0.43).
Conclusions:
- Parental concerns are critical for referring children for further developmental assessment and management.
- The Parent's Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) can aid in detection but is not a definitive screening tool.
- Parental input holds significant value, potentially exceeding that of screening tests alone, in identifying developmental issues.
Unlabelled:
The early detection of developmental and behavioral problems in children is crucial for early intervention. The effectiveness of early detection depends on skills and interest of clinicians. Parents are the precious sources of information. The suspicions of parents about their children's development should be considered. The success of early identification is influenced by pediatricians who elicit, recognize, select clinical information and judge how to manage. The purpose of the present pilot study was to assess whether parents can be the sources of clinical information in detecting developmental problems of their children. Parent's Evaluation of developmental status (PEDS) is used to elicit parents which is the useful and widely used tool for developmental screening by measuring the sensitivity and sensitivity of PEDS. The additional goal is to find the prevalence of developmental problems in this population.
Material And Method:
A total of 216 parent-child dyads, children 0-72 months of age, were recruited from the Pediatrics Outpatient Clinic and Child Health Supervision Clinic at Phramongkutklao Hospital from 1 July 2001 to 31 July 2002. Children who were chronically ill or had known developmental delay were excluded. Data regarding prenatal, perinatal and postnatal risk factors, health status, childrearing practice, parental education and family income were gathered. The Parents Evaluations of Developmental Status (PEDS) was completed by interview. The developmental screening test was administered by using Denver II. The authors compared the items of language, fine motor adaptive and gross motor skills.
Statistical Analysis:
Descriptive statistic for demographic data was used and diagnostic test was performed in order to detect sensitivity and specificity. The Kappa was administered for analyzing the relationship between PEDS and Denver II.
Results:
Certain concern in developmental delay was 4.1 % and suspected Denver II was 3.24 %. Forty-two point five percent of the children who were suspected in Denver II were not concerned. Forty-seven percent of children who was concerned also failed in Denver II. Ninety-four percent of children had no concern and also had normal screening test. The sensitivity of PEDS was 57.14 percent, the specificity was 97.6 percent. The agreement of PEDS and Denver II was 0.43 (Kappa = 0.43).
Conclusion:
PEDS could play a role in detection of developmental problems but was not a good tool in screening. Therefore, significant concerns of parents about their children's development are the critical information for referral to have further management. In other words, parents concerns could have far more advantage than the screening test.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...

