Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Methods of evaluating immunotoxicity.

Jacques Descotes1

  • 1Centre Antipoison - Centre de Pharmacovigilance, 162 Avenue Lacassagne, 69424 Lyon cedex 03, France. jacques-georges.descotes@chu-lyon.fr

Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
|July 27, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Assessing drug and chemical safety requires evaluating immunotoxicity, focusing on predicting immunosuppression using animal models. Current methods lack consensus and struggle to predict other immune-mediated adverse effects, highlighting a need for standardized human data.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of Loco-Regional Skin Toxicity Induced by an In Situ Forming Depot after a Single Subcutaneous Injection at Different Volumes and Flow Rates in Göttingen Minipigs.

International journal of molecular sciences·2021
Same author

Nonclinical evaluation of immunological safety in Göttingen Minipigs: The CONFIRM initiative.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2018
Same author

Safety profile of etifoxine: A French pharmacovigilance survey.

Fundamental & clinical pharmacology·2015
Same author

Electrophysiological, haemodynamic, and mitochondrial alterations induced by levobupivacaine during myocardial ischemia in a pig model: protection by lipid emulsions?

Fundamental & clinical pharmacology·2015
Same author

Decrease in factor V activity in patients treated with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine.

Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology·2014
Same author

Imiquimod and pulmonary embolism: a case report.

Therapie·2014
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • * Pharmacology and Toxicology
  • * Immunology and Drug Safety

Background:

  • * Immunotoxicology is crucial for evaluating drug and chemical safety, encompassing immunosuppression, immunostimulation, hypersensitivity, and autoimmunity.
  • * Current nonclinical assessments primarily focus on predicting immunosuppression using animal models, with limited consensus on comprehensive testing strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To review current nonclinical methods for assessing immunotoxicity and identify limitations.
  • * To discuss the reliability of histological examination versus functional immune assays for predicting immunosuppression.
  • * To highlight the challenges in predicting immunostimulation, hypersensitivity, and autoimmunity.

Main Methods:

  • * Review of existing animal models and assays for immunotoxicity assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • * Discussion of recommended first-line assays, such as T-dependent antibody response assays (plaque-forming cell assay, ELISA).
  • * Consideration of various supplementary assays including lymphocyte subset analysis, NK cell activity, and host resistance assays.
  • Main Results:

    • * A T-dependent antibody response assay is recommended as a primary screening tool for immunosuppression.
    • * Limited reliable animal models exist for predicting immunostimulation, hypersensitivity, or autoimmunity, except for contact sensitization.
    • * A significant limitation is the lack of human data for validating nonclinical immunotoxicity assessments.

    Conclusions:

    • * Standardized and validated immunological endpoints and clinical criteria are essential for human clinical trials and epidemiological studies.
    • * Further research is needed to develop reliable methods for predicting all types of immune-mediated adverse effects.
    • * Integrating human data is critical for improving the accuracy of immunotoxicity risk assessment.