Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Finding function: evaluation methods for functional genomic data.

Chad L Myers1, Daniel R Barrett, Matthew A Hibbs

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. clmyers@princeton.edu

BMC Genomics
|July 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Circulating imidazole propionate and coronary heart disease risk: interplay between histidine intake, fiber, and gut microbiome.

BMC medicine·2026
Same author

Item recognition is associated with gut microbiota composition in healthy humans.

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Orobas: A computational approach for scoring and analysis of quantitative chemical-genetic interactions from CRISPR-Cas9 screens.

STAR protocols·2026
Same author

Shotgun Metagenomic Profiling of the Gut Virome in Prodromal and Confirmed Parkinson's Disease.

Annals of neurology·2026
Same author

Long-lasting gut microbiome and fecal metabolome alterations after colorectal adenoma removal and their relationship to colorectal cancer.

Cell host & microbe·2026
Same author

Dietary sulfur amino acids enhance anti-tumor immunity in colon cancer via an NKT cell-XCL1-cDC1 circuit.

Immunity·2026
Same journal

Antimicrobial resistance and genomic characteristics of bovine Escherichia coli from five northern provinces of China.

BMC genomics·2026
Same journal

Reference-guided transcriptomics resolves CoHMGR family composition and expression diversification during postharvest warm conditioning of Camellia oleifera seed kernels.

BMC genomics·2026
Same journal

Multi-omics analysis identifies loci associated with pyrethroid resistance across sister species in the Anopheles gambiae species complex.

BMC genomics·2026
Same journal

Comparative and population genomics analyses of eared pheasants inhabiting highly varying altitudes.

BMC genomics·2026
Same journal

Identification of differentially expressed lncRNAs in different daily weight gains of Jiangquan black pigs and functional analysis of LOC100518120.

BMC genomics·2026
Same journal

A self-attention-based deep learning model for identifying key genes in insect pupal metamorphosis.

BMC genomics·2026
See all related articles

Current functional genomics evaluation methods are inconsistent and biased. This study introduces a new gold standard and framework for accurate data and computational method assessment, improving biological insights.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Accurate evaluation of genomic and proteomic data quality is crucial for biological discovery.
  • Existing evaluation methods in functional genomics lack standardization and exhibit functional biases, leading to misleading conclusions.
  • Inconsistent evaluation hinders the comparison of computational methods and large-scale datasets, limiting generalizability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and address the limitations of current evaluation approaches in functional genomics.
  • To propose novel, accurate, and representative methods for characterizing genomic data and computational approaches.
  • To provide a community resource for improved genomic data and method evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing evaluation methodologies in functional genomics to identify inconsistencies and biases.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a functional genomics gold standard curated by expert biologists.
  • Implementation of an evaluation framework utilizing the developed gold standard.

    • Main Results:

    • Current evaluation methods are shown to be quantitatively and qualitatively misleading.
    • A novel functional genomics gold standard has been established through expert curation.
    • The proposed evaluation framework effectively characterizes genomic approaches using the gold standard.

    Conclusions:

    • Improved evaluation methods are essential for maximizing the scientific value derived from genomic data.
    • The developed gold standard and framework offer a solution for accurate genomic evaluation.
    • Broader community discussion on genomic evaluation standards is encouraged.