Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
07:52
Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
Evaluation of time-to-contact measures for assessing postural stability
Jeffrey M Haddad1, Jeff L Gagnon, Christopher J Hasson
1Biomechanics and Motor Control Laboratories, Dept. of Exercise Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
|July 28, 2006
Summary
Postural time-to-contact (TtC) offers a promising measure of stability by considering movement dynamics. However, inconsistent calculation methods create ambiguity, necessitating standardized approaches for reliable postural control assessment.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Human Motor Control
- Physiology
Background:
- Traditional postural stability assessment relies on spatial measures of center of mass (CoM) or center of pressure (CoP).
- These spatial measures may not fully capture the dynamic aspects of postural control.
- The postural control system likely uses dynamic information like velocity and acceleration for stabilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare various methodologies for calculating postural time-to-contact (TtC).
- To assess the impact of different calculation methods on TtC values.
- To discuss issues related to the interpretation of TtC data in postural stability research.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of diverse postural time-to-contact (TtC) calculation methodologies.
- Data collection during quiet stance and induced-sway conditions.
- Analysis of the effects of methodological variations on TtC values.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in TtC values were observed based on the calculation methodology used.
- The study highlights ambiguity in current TtC data due to methodological variations.
- Interpretation of TtC requires careful consideration of the specific calculation approach.
Conclusions:
- Standardization of TtC calculation methods is crucial for reliable postural stability assessment.
- Understanding methodological differences is key to interpreting TtC data accurately.
- Further research is needed to establish a consensus on TtC computation.
