Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peripheral doses in CyberKnife radiosurgery.

Paula L Petti1, Cynthia F Chuang, Vernon Smith

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Long-75 Box 0226, San Francisco, California 94143, USA. petti@radonc17.ucsf.edu

Medical Physics
|July 29, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Therapeutic Hydrogel Microneedle Patch for Burn Wound Field Care.

ACS applied bio materials·2026
Same author

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful spinal metastases: a decade of experience at a single institution.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2024
Same author

Comparison of Intact Fish Skin Graft and Allograft as Temporary Coverage for Full-Thickness Burns: A Non-Inferiority Study.

Biomedicines·2024
Same author

Subcutaneous Anti-inflammatory Therapies to Prevent Burn Progression in a Swine Model of Contact Burn Injury.

Military medicine·2023
Same author

Mitigating the uncertainty in small field dosimetry by leveraging machine learning strategies.

Physics in medicine and biology·2022
Same author

Small-field measurement and Monte Carlo model validation of a novel image-guided radiotherapy system.

Medical physics·2021
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

CyberKnife radiosurgery delivers higher peripheral doses than Gamma Knife or IMRT, primarily due to leakage radiation. Understanding these doses is crucial for patient safety in radiation oncology.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Radiosurgery

Background:

  • Accurate dosimetry is essential for radiation therapy planning.
  • Peripheral dose from radiosurgery treatments requires careful evaluation to minimize off-target effects.
  • CyberKnife, Gamma Knife, and IMRT are distinct radiation delivery techniques with varying dose distributions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the dose outside the treatment field for CyberKnife conformal treatments.
  • To compare CyberKnife peripheral doses with those from Gamma Knife and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT).
  • To identify the primary sources contributing to peripheral dose in CyberKnife radiosurgery.

Main Methods:

  • Developed CyberKnife, Gamma Knife, and IMRT treatment plans for hypothetical brain and thorax lesions in an anthropomorphic phantom.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured peripheral doses using LiF thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) at various depths and distances from the irradiated volume.
  • Conducted experiments with varying collimator sizes and single-isocenter CyberKnife plans to assess dose contributions from beam entry/exit, scatter, and leakage.

    • Main Results:

    • CyberKnife peripheral doses ranged from 0.16 to 0.041% of monitor units (MU) at 18-71 cm from the field edge.
    • These doses were 2-5 times higher than Gamma Knife and up to 4 times higher than IMRT for comparable brain treatments.
    • Leakage radiation was the primary contributor to CyberKnife peripheral dose, especially at distances >40 cm from the field edge.

    Conclusions:

    • CyberKnife treatments result in significantly higher peripheral doses compared to Gamma Knife and IMRT.
    • Leakage radiation is the dominant source of peripheral dose in CyberKnife, with beam entry/exit doses also contributing at closer distances.
    • These findings highlight the importance of considering CyberKnife's peripheral dose characteristics in treatment planning and patient safety protocols.