Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical practice guidelines: a critical review.

Keng Boon Harold Tan1

  • 1Ministry of Health, Singapore. harold1812@yahoo.com.sg

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance Incorporating Leadership in Health Services
|August 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary

This review examines clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and their compliance assessments. Understanding factors influencing CPG adherence is crucial for improving healthcare quality and developing effective strategies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing doctors' compliance with guidelines on diabetes management.

International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health servicesยท2006
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Medical Practice Evaluation

Background:

  • Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are essential tools for enhancing healthcare quality.
  • Assessing practitioner compliance with CPGs is vital for understanding adherence and identifying barriers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current landscape of CPG use and compliance assessments.
  • To identify factors influencing practitioner adherence to CPGs.
  • To inform strategies for improving CPG compliance.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature review of CPGs, their attributes, benefits, and pitfalls.
  • Analysis of studies assessing CPG compliance, focusing on data collection methods (qualitative vs. quantitative) and assessment measures (process vs. outcome).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • 57 CPG compliance assessment studies were reviewed, with nearly two-thirds using objective methods.
  • Subjective assessments varied in data analysis: 47% quantitative, 32% qualitative, 21% mixed.
  • Over 80% of studies utilized process measures, while only 5% exclusively used outcome measures.

Conclusions:

  • Assessment methodologies significantly impact the identification of factors influencing CPG compliance.
  • Factors affecting compliance can be physician-related, guideline-specific, health system-based, or patient-related.
  • A deeper understanding of these factors enables targeted strategies to enhance physician CPG compliance and improve patient care.