Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Deriving the Time Course of Glutamate Clearance with a Deconvolution Analysis of Astrocytic Transporter Currents
Published on: August 7, 2013
Structural rearrangements at the translocation pore of the human glutamate transporter, EAAT1
Barbara H Leighton1, Rebecca P Seal, Spencer D Watts
1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Vollum Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97201, USA.
Abstract:
Structure-function studies of mammalian and bacterial excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs), as well as the crystal structure of a related archaeal glutamate transporter, support a model in which TM7, TM8, and the re-entrant loops HP1 and HP2 participate in forming a substrate translocation pathway within each subunit of a trimer. However, the transport mechanism, including precise binding sites for substrates and co-transported ions and changes in the tertiary structure underlying transport, is still not known. In this study, we used chemical cross-linking of introduced cysteine pairs in a cysteine-less version of EAAT1 to examine the dynamics of key domains associated with the translocation pore. Here we show that cysteine substitution at Ala-395, Ala-367, and Ala-440 results in functional single and double cysteine transporters and that in the absence of glutamate or dl-threo-beta-benzyloxyaspartate (dl-TBOA), A395C in the highly conserved TM7 can be cross-linked to A367C in HP1 and to A440C in HP2. The formation of these disulfide bonds is reversible and occurs intra-molecularly. Interestingly, cross-linking A395C to A367C appears to abolish transport, whereas cross-linking A395C to A440C lowers the affinities for glutamate and dl-TBOA but does not change the maximal transport rate. Additionally, glutamate and dl-TBOA binding prevent cross-linking in both double cysteine transporters, whereas sodium binding facilitates cross-linking in the A395C/A367C transporter. These data provide evidence that within each subunit of EAAT1, Ala-395 in TM7 resides close to a residue at the tip of each re-entrant loop (HP1 and HP2) and that these residues are repositioned relative to one another at different steps in the transport cycle. Such behavior likely reflects rearrangements in the tertiary structure of the translocation pore during transport and thus provides constraints for modeling the structural dynamics associated with transport.
Related Concept Videos
Protein Translocation Machinery on the ER Membrane
Sec61 protein conducting channel
In eukaryotes, the translocon complex comprises a core heterotrimeric translocator channel called the Sec61 complex. This channel includes three transmembrane proteins, Sec61α, Sec61β, and Sec61γ, and is the largest subunit of the translocon complex.
Export of Misfolded Proteins out of the ER
Post-translational Translocation of Proteins to the RER
Targeting proteins to the ER
Hsp40 and Hsp70 chaperone molecules bind the translated proteins in the cytosol to prevent their folding. The chaperone binding helps to keep the signal...
Translocation of Proteins into the Mitochondria
Sorting of outer membrane proteins:
Mitochondrial outer membrane proteins are of two types: the transmembrane, beta-barrel porins, and the membrane-anchored, alpha-helical proteins. Beta-barrel porin precursors are translocated by the TOM complex and inserted into the outer mitochondrial membrane by the SAM complex. In contrast,...
Energy to Drive Translocation
Generally, polypeptides are unfolded by two distinct...
The Significance of Membrane Transport
Transporters facilitate either an active or passive movement of solutes. They can allow a single-molecule transport down its...

