Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Tragedy, utopia and medical progress.

S Fredriksen1

  • 1University of Oslo, PO Box 1130, N-0318 Oslo, Norway. stale.fredriksen@medisin.uio.no

Journal of Medical Ethics
|August 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Marine heatwaves and the collapse of marginal North Atlantic kelp forests.

Scientific reports·2020
Same author

Diseases are invisible.

Medical humanities·2013
Same author

Coping with obligations towards patient and society: an empirical study of attitudes and practice among Norwegian physicians.

Journal of medical ethics·1995
Same author

Left ventricular performance and cerebral haemodynamics during xenon anaesthesia. A transoesophageal echocardiography and transcranial Doppler sonography study.

Anaesthesia·1993
Same author

[Is the main goal of the health care services to produce health?].

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·1993
Same author

[Quality nursing care].

Sykepleien·1976
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Medicalization, framed as tragedy, reveals how medical progress creates insecurity alongside benefits. Understanding this tragic conflict, exemplified by sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) prevention, is key.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Public Health
  • Sociology of Medicine

Background:

  • The concept of medicalization is examined through contrasting utopian and tragic frameworks.
  • Utopian views attribute setbacks to errors, while tragedy acknowledges inherent conflicts and their consequences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose that a tragic framework offers a more insightful understanding of medicalization than a utopian one.
  • To explore how medical progress, while empowering, also highlights human fallibility and generates insecurity.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis juxtaposing utopian and tragic perspectives on medicalization.
  • Case illustration using epidemiological data on sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Medicalization arises from tragic conflicts inherent in medical progress, not just errors.
  • Epidemiological findings on prone vs. supine infant sleep positions for SIDS prevention illustrate this duality.
  • While offering solutions (supine sleeping), new uncertainties emerge regarding other risk factors.

Conclusions:

  • A tragic lens better explains the complex nature of medicalization and its associated insecurities.
  • Medical advancements create dilemmas where benefits are intertwined with unavoidable risks and uncertainties.
  • The ongoing process of medicalization necessitates continued vigilance and research into potential overlooked factors.