Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
Using Bioluminescent Imaging to Investigate Synergism Between Streptococcus pneumoniae and Influenza A Virus in Infant Mice
Published on: April 14, 2011
Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?
1Mercy Hospital for Women, PO Box 5027, Heidelberg West, Victoria 3081, Australia. dwilkinson@mercy.com.au
Insights
Decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment for infants often consider intellectual disability. This analysis questions if intellectual disability unfairly influences these critical ethical decisions in neonatal care.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Neonatal Intensive Care
- Disability Studies
Background:
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) presents complex ethical challenges.
- Decisions are frequently influenced by predictions of severe intellectual disability in infants.
- Current guidelines emphasize infant best interests, but the role of intellectual disability remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine the ethical considerations surrounding intellectual disability in decisions about neonatal life support.
- To analyze why intellectual disability may be weighted more heavily than physical disability in assessing an infant's future interests.
- To explore potential discrimination in basing end-of-life decisions on predicted intellectual capacity.
Main Methods:
- Philosophical analysis of ethical principles in neonatal care.
- Review of professional guidelines and ethical frameworks.
- Discussion of the impact of intellectual disability on an infant's best interests.
Main Results:
- Intellectual disability can affect an infant's best interests in specific, though not always clear-cut, ways.
- The paper explores three potential mechanisms through which intellectual disability impacts an infant's future interests.
- Significant challenges exist regarding the ethical justification for considering intellectual disability in these decisions.
Conclusions:
- The role of intellectual disability in neonatal end-of-life decisions requires careful ethical scrutiny.
- Decisions must be grounded in a nuanced understanding of an infant's best interests, avoiding discriminatory assumptions.
- Further discussion is needed to clarify the ethical implications of intellectual disability in NICU treatment withdrawal.
Abstract:
One of the most contentious ethical issues in the neonatal intensive care unit is the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from infants who may otherwise survive. In practice, one of the most important factors influencing this decision is the prediction that the infant will be severely intellectually disabled. Most professional guidelines suggest that decisions should be made on the basis of the best interests of the infant. It is, however, not clear how intellectual disability affects those interests. Why should intellectual disability be more important than physical disability to the future interests of an infant? Is it discriminatory to base decisions on this? This paper will try to unravel the above questions. It seems that if intellectual disability does affect the best interests of the child it must do so in one of three ways. These possibilities will be discussed as well as the major challenges to the notion that intellectual disability should have a role in such decisions. The best interests of the child can be affected by severe or profound intellectual disability. It is, though, not as clear-cut as some might expect.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:29Intellectual Disability
01:27Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
01:30Ethical Dilemmas II
01:29Environmental Influences on Intelligence
01:21The Nativist Approach