Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The real problem with equipoise.

Winston Chiong1

  • 1Stanford University Division of General Internal Medicine, USA.

The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB
|August 4, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The equipoise requirement in clinical research, a principle of genuine doubt about intervention effectiveness, is ethically problematic, particularly in developing nations. This paper critiques traditional patient-centered views and proposes a new Kantian framework for physician obligations in clinical research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward Inclusive Clinical Trials.

JAMA internal medicine·2026
Same author

Additive effect of patient anosognosia and theory of mind deficit on dementia caregiver distress.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same author

The National Dementia Workforce Study: Development of Questionnaires for Home Care, Assisted Living, and Nursing Home Settings.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2025
Same author

The Effect of the Care Ecosystem Collaborative Care Model on End-of-Life Outcomes for People With Dementia and Their Caregivers.

The American journal of hospice & palliative care·2025
Same author

The National Dementia Workforce Study: Methods for Surveying Community Clinicians Who Provide Care to People With Dementia.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2025
Same author

Changes of a Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Associated With Lecanemab Therapy in a Patient With Alzheimer Disease.

Neurology. Clinical practice·2025
Same journal

Defending the Ethical Permissibility of Laryngeal Transplantation.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

A Framework of Institutional Obligations for Pragmatic Clinical Trials.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

Should Adherence to Medical Recommendations Be a Requirement for Kidney Transplant Candidacy?

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

How "America First" Abandoned Global Health: The Case for an African Model.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

Carrots and Sticks: Incentives in Shaping Digital Health Products.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same journal

From Empowerment to Offloading: Task Shifting and the Redistribution of Responsibility in Digital Health.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Clinical Research Ethics
  • Medical Philosophy

Background:

  • The principle of equipoise mandates genuine uncertainty regarding the superiority of interventions in clinical trials.
  • This ethical requirement traditionally prioritizes current patient well-being over future patient benefit.
  • Equipoise presents significant ethical challenges, especially in resource-limited settings like the Global South.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the "difference position" that separates clinical research from clinical care.
  • To critique the traditional, solely patient-centered ethical framework underpinning equipoise.
  • To introduce a novel ethical framework for physician conduct in clinical research and medical education.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical argumentation and ethical analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critique of existing ethical norms in clinical research.
  • Development of a Kantian-based ethical model for physician partiality.

    • Main Results:

    • The traditional patient-centered view of physician obligations in clinical research is insufficient.
    • The "difference position" fails to adequately address the ethical complexities of clinical research.
    • A Kantian approach offers a more nuanced understanding of physician duties, allowing for reasonable partiality.

    Conclusions:

    • Revising the ethical foundations of clinical research is necessary.
    • A Kantian framework provides a robust alternative to the problematic equipoise requirement.
    • This new perspective supports ethical conduct in clinical research and medical education, particularly in diverse global contexts.