Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
  1. Home
  2. Research Domains
  3. Biomedical And Clinical Sciences
  4. Oncology And Carcinogenesis
  5. Predictive And Prognostic Markers
  6. Comparison Of A Guaiac Based And An Immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Test In Screening For Colorectal Cancer In A General Average Risk Population.

Comparison of a guaiac based and an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average risk population.

L Guittet1, V Bouvier, N Mariotte

  • 1Cancers and Populations, ERI 3 INSERM, UFR Medecine, CHU-14000, Caen, France.

Gut
|August 8, 2006

Related Experiment Videos

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The immunochemical faecal occult blood test (I-FOBT) shows improved sensitivity for detecting colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas compared to the guaiac faecal occult blood test (G-FOBT). Optimizing the I-FOBT threshold balances sensitivity and specificity for better screening.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • The guaiac faecal occult blood test (G-FOBT) is a recommended colorectal cancer screening tool.
  • However, its low sensitivity limits its global adoption and effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of G-FOBT with the immunochemical faecal occult blood test (I-FOBT).
  • To evaluate I-FOBT at various positivity cut-off values for colorectal cancer screening.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 10,673 average-risk patients underwent both G-FOBT and I-FOBT.
  • Colonoscopy was recommended for patients with at least one positive test result.

Main Results:

  • At a 20 ng/ml threshold, I-FOBT significantly increased sensitivity for cancer (50%) and high-risk adenomas (256%) but reduced specificity.
  • A 50 ng/ml threshold for I-FOBT doubled advanced neoplasia detection without decreasing specificity.
  • At 75 ng/ml, I-FOBT achieved 90% higher sensitivity and 33% fewer false positives for advanced neoplasia, with a similar positivity rate to G-FOBT.

Conclusions:

  • Growing evidence supports replacing G-FOBT with I-FOBT for colorectal cancer screening.
  • The benefits of I-FOBT are more pronounced for high-risk adenomas than for cancers.
  • Automated reading technology enables selection of positivity rates for optimal sensitivity and specificity balance.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies