Comparison of a guaiac based and an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in screening for colorectal cancer in a general average risk population.
L Guittet1, V Bouvier, N Mariotte
1Cancers and Populations, ERI 3 INSERM, UFR Medecine, CHU-14000, Caen, France.
Gut
|August 8, 2006
Related Experiment Videos
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
The immunochemical faecal occult blood test (I-FOBT) shows improved sensitivity for detecting colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas compared to the guaiac faecal occult blood test (G-FOBT). Optimizing the I-FOBT threshold balances sensitivity and specificity for better screening.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Oncology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- The guaiac faecal occult blood test (G-FOBT) is a recommended colorectal cancer screening tool.
- However, its low sensitivity limits its global adoption and effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of G-FOBT with the immunochemical faecal occult blood test (I-FOBT).
- To evaluate I-FOBT at various positivity cut-off values for colorectal cancer screening.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 10,673 average-risk patients underwent both G-FOBT and I-FOBT.
- Colonoscopy was recommended for patients with at least one positive test result.
Main Results:
- At a 20 ng/ml threshold, I-FOBT significantly increased sensitivity for cancer (50%) and high-risk adenomas (256%) but reduced specificity.
- A 50 ng/ml threshold for I-FOBT doubled advanced neoplasia detection without decreasing specificity.
- At 75 ng/ml, I-FOBT achieved 90% higher sensitivity and 33% fewer false positives for advanced neoplasia, with a similar positivity rate to G-FOBT.
Conclusions:
- Growing evidence supports replacing G-FOBT with I-FOBT for colorectal cancer screening.
- The benefits of I-FOBT are more pronounced for high-risk adenomas than for cancers.
- Automated reading technology enables selection of positivity rates for optimal sensitivity and specificity balance.