Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Physiological basis for cochlear and auditory brainstem implants.

Aage R Møller1

  • 1School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Tex., USA.

Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
|August 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tinnitus and tinnitus disorder: Theoretical and operational definitions (an international multidisciplinary proposal).

Progress in brain research·2021
Same author

Sensorineural Tinnitus: Its Pathology and Probable Therapies.

International journal of otolaryngology·2016
Same author

Pathology of Tinnitus and Hyperacusis-Clinical Implications.

BioMed research international·2015
Same author

Plasticity of neural systems in tinnitus.

Neural plasticity·2014
Same author

Directing neural plasticity to understand and treat tinnitus.

Hearing research·2012
Same author

Techniques of intraoperative monitoring for spinal cord function: their past, present, and future directions.

Neurological research·2011

Cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) restore speech understanding by bypassing damaged auditory pathways. Neural plasticity allows the auditory system to adapt, enabling effective sound processing despite altered input.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Speech Processing

Background:

  • Frequency discrimination is crucial for speech perception, relying on spectral and temporal auditory information.
  • Cochlear implants (CIs) bypass cochlear functions, yet achieve good speech discrimination, challenging traditional models.
  • Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) bypass the auditory nerve, with variable outcomes depending on the cause of auditory nerve damage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the mechanisms underlying speech discrimination with cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants.
  • To investigate the role of spectral and temporal processing in frequency discrimination.
  • To understand the contribution of neural plasticity to auditory rehabilitation.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of existing literature on cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants.
  • Analysis of speech discrimination performance in patients with different auditory prostheses.
  • Discussion of the principles of spectral and temporal coding in the auditory system.

    • Main Results:

    • Cochlear implants can provide effective speech discrimination, possibly due to signal redundancy and neural plasticity.
    • Auditory brainstem implants show promise in specific patient groups, achieving speech discrimination comparable to modern cochlear implants.
    • The auditory nervous system's plasticity is a key factor in adapting to prosthetic sound input.

    Conclusions:

    • Speech discrimination with cochlear implants and ABIs is facilitated by processing redundancy and significant neural plasticity.
    • The auditory system's adaptability allows it to compensate for the loss of natural auditory processing.
    • Further research into auditory prosthetics should consider the interplay of device design and neural adaptation.